<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Boston Media Domain &#187; Domains</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/tag/domains/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com</link>
	<description>Search, Social and Online Media for Domains</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:18:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Domain Age as a SEO Factor</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/domain-age-seo-factor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/domain-age-seo-factor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeff selig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary & Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AJAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[factors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[follow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nofollow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[page rank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ranking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Static Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bostonmediadomain.com/?p=1172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Domain Registration Date: Per Google&#8217;s patent(s), the Age of a Domains Registration is a factor.  However, the value of such is, like all other factors, open to speculation. More important is for how long the Domain Name is currently registered. A longer term serves to demonstrate an intent to commit to remaining active further into the future than does a shorter term. Microsoft weighed in on this with their patent regarding Ranking Domains Using Domain Maturity What helps most is having static content on the domain which in turn helps that domain build trust. Having a holding page on the domain brings some benefit but it is the attachment of that domain to a topic and the relation of that domain with the age of the content that helps. If you buy and old domain and completely change the content of that domain, you have to build up trust again. However if the old domain has trusted links coming into it and a decent PR then it can be beneficial. Domain related tools Domain Age Tool &#8211; find out the age of your competitor&#8217;s domains Domain Stats Tool &#8211; find all kind of statistics about a domain Domain Look-up &#8211; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bostonmediadomain.com%2Fdomain-age-seo-factor%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bostonmediadomain.com%2Fdomain-age-seo-factor%2F&amp;source=seosem&amp;style=normal&amp;service=is.gd&amp;hashtags=AJAX,Brin,buy,content,Domain,Domain+name,Domains,factors,follow,GA,google,HTTP,ip,Link,links,Microsoft,Nofollow,Page,page+rank,PHP,ranking,RON,ROS,SEO,Static+Content,stats,Title,trust,web,Whois,wp&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<h2><strong><span class="wp-decoratr-image"><a rel="external nofollow" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/51727341@N00/2315338302"> </a></span><span class="wp-decoratr-image"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/105/298661265_85394db3bb_m.jpg" alt="代煮免费ripn米（注ripn免费域 名）" /></span></strong><strong>Domain Registration Date: </strong></h2>
<p>Per Google&#8217;s patent(s), the <a href="http://bostonmediadomain.com/google-sandbox-patent/ "><strong>Age of a Domains Registration</strong></a> is a factor.  However, the value of such is, like all other factors, open to speculation. More important is for how long the <a href="http://www.domainsforsaleandrent.com/hosting/hosting-domain/">Domain Name</a> is currently registered. A longer term serves to demonstrate an intent to commit to remaining active further into the future than does a shorter term. Microsoft weighed in on this with their patent regarding <strong><a href="http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/ranking-domains-domain-maturity">Ranking Domains Using Domain Maturity</a></strong></p>
<p>What helps most is having static content on the domain which in turn helps that domain build trust. Having a holding page on the domain brings some benefit but it is the attachment of that domain to a topic and the relation of that domain with the age of the content that helps.</p>
<p>If you buy and old domain and completely change the content of that domain, you have to build up trust again. However if the old domain has trusted links coming into it and a decent <acronym title="Page Ranking">PR</acronym> then it can be beneficial.</p>
<p><strong> Domain related tools</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.webconfs.com/domain-age.php"><strong>Domain Age Tool</strong></a> &#8211; find out the age of your competitor&#8217;s domains<br />
<a href="http://www.webconfs.com/domain-stats.php"><strong>Domain Stats Tool</strong></a> &#8211; find all kind of statistics about a domain<br />
<a href="http://www.iwebtool.com/domain_lookup"><strong>Domain Look-up</strong></a> &#8211; Retrieve a range of information about a domain<a href="http://www.ajaxwhois.com"><strong> </strong></a><br />
<a href="http://www.ajaxwhois.com"><strong>Domain Whois</strong></a> &#8211; Retrieve domain whois -ownership information<br />
<strong><a href="http://www.iwebtool.com/domain_availability">Domain Availability</a> </strong> &#8211; Check availability of domains<br />
<a href="http://www.iwebtool.com/instant"><strong>Instant Domain Checker</strong></a> &#8211; Check availability of domains instantly</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-1172"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/domain-age-seo-factor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ranking Domains Using Domain Maturity</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/ranking-domains-domain-maturity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/ranking-domains-domain-maturity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeff selig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary & Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Algorithm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CGI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Client]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Description]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expired domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[factors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[follow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Query]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ranking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Registrar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Script]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bostonmediadomain.com/?p=1162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ranking Domains Using Domain Maturity Invented by Janine Crumb, Krishna C Gade, Rangan Majumder, Vishnu Challam Assigned to Microsoft US Patent Application 20080086467 Published April 10, 2008 Filed October 10, 2006 Abstract Ranking domains for search engines is provided herein. To rank a domain, contributing domains associated with the domain are identified. Additionally, the maturity of each of the contributing domains is determined. A rank for the domain is then determined based at least in part on the maturity of each of the contributing domains. The domain rankings may then be used to order results for search queries. Inventors: Crumb; Janine; (Seattle, WA) ; Gade; Krishna C.; (Redmond, WA) ; Majumder; Rangan; (Redmond, WA) ; Challam; Vishnu; (Bellevue, WA) Correspondence Name and Address: SHOOK, HARDY &#38; BACON L.L.P.;(c/o MICROSOFT CORPORATION) INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT, 2555 GRAND BOULEVARD KANSAS CITY MO 64108-2613 US Assignee Name and Adress: Microsoft Corporation Redmond WA Serial No.: 548152 Series Code: 11 Filed: October 10, 2006 U.S. Current Class: 707/5; 707/E17.108 U.S. Class at Publication: 707/5 Intern&#8217;l Class: G06F 17/30 20060101 G06F017/30 Claims 1. A method for ranking a domain, the method comprising:receiving a list of one or more contributing domains associated with the domain;determining a maturity [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bostonmediadomain.com%2Franking-domains-domain-maturity%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bostonmediadomain.com%2Franking-domains-domain-maturity%2F&amp;source=seosem&amp;style=normal&amp;service=is.gd&amp;hashtags=action,Algorithm,API,app,applications,Ask,ASP,attention,CGI,Client,content,CTR,data,Description,desire,Domain,Domains,expired+domains,factors,Flash,follow,Free,GA,Hit,html,HTTP,IAB,Internet,ip,isp,Link,links,Matt,Microsoft,Opera,Ping,Query,ranking,Registrar,RON,ROS,Script,search,Search+Engine,search+engines,Server,Spam,Tag,trust,Update,Visit,web&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><a href="http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.html&amp;r=1&amp;p=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;d=PG01&amp;S1=20080086467.PGNR.&amp;OS=dn/20080086467&amp;RS=DN/20080086467">Ranking Domains Using Domain Maturity</a><br />
Invented by  Janine Crumb,  Krishna C Gade, Rangan Majumder, Vishnu Challam<br />
Assigned to Microsoft<br />
US Patent Application 20080086467<br />
Published April 10, 2008<br />
Filed October 10, 2006</p>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p>
<p>Ranking domains for search engines is provided herein. To rank a domain,      contributing domains associated with the domain are identified.      Additionally, the maturity of each of the contributing domains is      determined. A rank for the domain is then determined based at least in      part on the maturity of each of the contributing domains. The domain      rankings may then be used to order results for search queries.</p>
<hr />
<table border="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="10%" align="LEFT" valign="TOP">Inventors:</td>
<td width="90%" align="LEFT"><strong>Crumb; Janine</strong>; <em>(Seattle, WA)</em> <strong>; Gade; Krishna C.</strong>; <em>(Redmond, WA)</em> <strong>; Majumder; Rangan</strong>; <em>(Redmond, WA)</em> <strong>; Challam; Vishnu</strong>; <em>(Bellevue, WA)</em></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="10%" align="LEFT" valign="TOP">Correspondence Name and Address:</td>
<td width="90%" align="LEFT"><strong></p>
<pre>    SHOOK, HARDY &amp; BACON L.L.P.;(c/o MICROSOFT CORPORATION)
    INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT, 2555 GRAND BOULEVARD
    KANSAS CITY
    MO
    64108-2613
    US</pre>
<p></strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="10%" align="LEFT" valign="TOP">Assignee Name and Adress:</td>
<td width="90%" align="LEFT"><strong>Microsoft Corporation</strong><br />
<strong>Redmond</strong><br />
<strong>WA</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="10%" align="LEFT" valign="TOP">Serial No.:</td>
<td width="90%" align="LEFT"><strong>548152</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="10%" align="LEFT" valign="TOP">Series Code:</td>
<td width="90%" align="LEFT"><strong>11 </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="10%" align="LEFT" valign="TOP">Filed:</td>
<td width="90%" align="LEFT"><strong>October 10, 2006</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table border="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="40%" align="LEFT" valign="TOP"><strong>U.S. Current Class:</strong></td>
<td width="60%" align="RIGHT" valign="TOP"><strong>707/5</strong>; 707/E17.108</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="40%" align="LEFT" valign="TOP"><strong>U.S. Class at Publication:</strong></td>
<td width="60%" align="RIGHT" valign="TOP"><strong>707/5</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="40%" align="LEFT" valign="TOP"><strong>Intern&#8217;l Class: </strong></td>
<td width="60%" align="RIGHT" valign="TOP">G06F 17/30 20060101 G06F017/30</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr /><strong><em>Claims</em></strong></p>
<hr />
<p>1. A method for ranking a domain, the method comprising:receiving a list      of one or more contributing domains associated with the      domain;determining a maturity for at least one of the one or more      contributing domains; andcalculating a rank for the domain based at least      in part on the maturity for the at least one of the one or more      contributing domains.</p>
<p>2. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the maturity for at least      one of the one or more contributing domains comprises identifying at      least one of the one or more contributing domains as a mature domain.</p>
<p>3. The method of claim 2, wherein the mature domain is identified based on      factors comprising at least one of a date of domain registration and a      date of first discovery of the mature domain.</p>
<p>4. The method of claim 3, wherein the mature domain is a contributing      domain that has been registered for more than one year without having      expired or being swapped.</p>
<p>5. The method of claim 2, wherein calculating the rank for the domain      comprises calculating the rank based at least in part on a rank of the      mature domain.</p>
<p>6. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the maturity for at least      one of the one or more contributing domains comprises identifying at      least one of the one or more contributing domains as an immature domain;      andwherein calculating the rank for the domain comprises calculating the      rank based at least in part on a rank of the immature domain, wherein the      rank of the immature domain is based on contributing domains associated      with the immature domain that have been identified as mature domains.</p>
<p>7. The method of claim 1, wherein calculating the rank for the domain      comprises calculating the rank based on a fraction of a number associated      with at least one of the one or more contributing domains, wherein the      fraction of the number associated with the at least one of the one or      more contributing domains corresponds to the maturity of the at least one      of the one or more contributing domains.</p>
<p>8. The method of claim 1, wherein each of the one or more contributing      domains comprise a domain that includes at least one link to the domain.</p>
<p>9. The method of claim 1, further comprising using the rank of the domain      to facilitate ordering results for a search query that include the      domain.</p>
<p>10. A method for presenting search results, the method      comprising:receiving information associated with a plurality of      domains;determining a maturity for each of one or more contributing      domains associated with each of the plurality of domains;calculating a      rank for each of the plurality of domains based at least in part on the      maturity for at least one of the one or more contributing domains      associated with the each of the plurality of domains;in response to      receiving a search query, generating one or more search results      comprising at least one of the plurality of domains that match the search      query; andpresenting the one or more search results in accordance with      ranks of the at least one of the plurality of domains that match the      search query.</p>
<p>11. The method of claim 10, wherein determining the maturity for each of      the one or more contributing domains associated with each of the      plurality of domains comprises identifying at least one of the one or      more contributing domains as a mature domain.</p>
<p>12. The method of claim 11, wherein calculating the rank for each of the      plurality of domains comprises calculating the rank based at least in      part on a rank of the mature domain.</p>
<p>13. The method of claim 11, wherein determining the maturity for each of      the one or more contributing domains associated with each of the      plurality of domains comprises identifying at least one of the one or      more contributing domains as an immature domain; andwherein calculating      the rank for each of the plurality of domains comprises calculating the      rank based at least in part on a rank of the mature domain and a rank of      the immature domain, wherein the rank of the immature domain is based      only on contributing domains associated with the immature domain that      have been identified as mature domains.</p>
<p>14. The method of claim 10, wherein calculating the rank for each of the      plurality of domains comprises calculating the rank based on a fraction      of a rank associated with at least one of the one or more contributing      domains, wherein the fraction of the rank associated with the at least      one of the one or more contributing domains corresponds to the maturity      of the at least one of the one or more contributing domains.</p>
<p>15. A search engine for ranking search results, the search engine      comprising:a ranking component configured to determine one or more      contributing domains associated with each of a plurality of domains, to      determine a maturity for each of the one or more contributing domains,      and to calculate a rank for each of the plurality of domains based at      least in part on the maturity for at least one of the one or more      contributing domains; anda searching component configured to perform a      search in response to a search query and to return one or more search      results comprising at least one of the plurality of domains that match      the search query.</p>
<p>16. The search engine of claim 15, further comprising a user interface      component configured to receive the search query and to present the one      or more search results in accordance with the ranks of the at least one      of the plurality of domains that match the search query.</p>
<p>17. The search engine of claim 15, wherein the ranking component is      further configured to determine the maturity for each of the one or more      contributing domains by identifying at least one of the one or more      contributing domains as a mature domain.</p>
<p>18. The search engine of claim 17, wherein the ranking component is      further configured to calculate the rank for each of the plurality of      domains based at least in part on a rank of the mature domain.</p>
<p>19. The search engine of claim 17, wherein the ranking component is      further configured to determine the maturity for each of the one or more      contributing domains by identifying at least one of the one or more      contributing domains as an immature domain and to calculate the rank for      each of the plurality of domains based at least in part on a rank of the      mature domain and a rank of the immature domain, wherein the rank of the      immature domain is based only on contributing domains associated with the      immature domain that have been identified as mature domains.</p>
<p>20. The search engine of claim 15, wherein the ranking component is      further configured to calculate the rank for each of the plurality of      domains based on a fraction of a rank associated with at least one of the      one or more contributing domains, wherein the fraction of the rank      associated with the at least one of the one or more contributing domains      corresponds to the maturity of the at least one of the one or more      contributing domains.</p>
<hr /><strong><em>Description</em></strong></p>
<hr />
<p>CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS</p>
<p>[0001]Not Applicable.</p>
<p>STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT</p>
<p>[0002]Not Applicable.</p>
<p>BACKGROUND</p>
<p>[0003]Domain ranking is frequently used by search engines to facilitate      the ordering of results for a search query. In general, a domain may be      ranked based in part on the number of contributing domains associated      with that domain. A contributing domain may be, for instance, one that      includes a link to the domain being ranked. For example, if hundreds of      other domains that maintain at least one web site include one or more      links to a particular domain, the domain may receive a higher rank than      another domain that is referenced by just a few other domains. In      addition to the number of contributing domains, ranks of the contributing      domains may influence the rank for the domain as well. For example, if a      trusted, popular domain, such as Yahoo.com or CNN.com, includes a link to      the domain, the ranks for such popular domains may be attributed to the      rank for the domain. Receiving a higher domain ranking often means that      the domain would be listed above other competing domains, thereby      affording more visits by those browsing or searching the Internet. For      domains that maintain commercial web sites or web sites that charge      advertisers on per-click or per-visit basis, a higher domain ranking      means better profitability. For example, sites like Yahoo.com and      CNN.com, which are visited by millions of people each day, attract many      commercial advertisers who are willing to pay large fees.</p>
<p>[0004]Typically, a domain includes links to other domains to make its      content more useful and attractive for its visitors. Most existing domain      ranking algorithms often assume that a number of contributing domains      that maintain one or more links to a particular domain provides an      indication of the popularity or utility of the particular domain. Those      algorithms also tend to assume that the particular domain is popular      and/or useful if a link is included in another domain that is well-known      for its popularity and utility, such as MSN.com. These assumptions have      been held to be mostly correct when it was neither easy nor cheap to      register and maintain a domain.</p>
<p>[0005]Due in part to increased competition in the domain registration      market in recent years, however, the cost involved in purchasing a domain      has decreased significantly. In some cases, domain registrars even offer      free domain registrations for up to thirty to sixty day trial periods.      Spammers often take advantage of such offers through a spam technique      known as a web farm. In particular, spammers purchase or otherwise obtain      a large number of sites and interlink the sites together to increase the      sites&#8217; rankings by artificially increasing the number of contributing      domains for some or all of the sites. In effect, this practice defeats      the assumption that the more a domain is referenced by other domains, the      more likely that the domains is popular and/or useful such that it should      be highly ranked.</p>
<p>SUMMARY</p>
<p>[0006]This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a      simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed      Description. This summary is not intended to identify key features or      essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to      be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.</p>
<p>[0007]Embodiments of the present invention relate to, among other things,      ranking a domain. One or more contributing domains associated with a      target domain are identified and the maturity of the contributing domains      is determined. By way of example only and not limitation, the maturity of      a contributing domain may be determined based on the date that it was      registered or the date that it was first discovered by a search engine. A      rank for the target domain is then calculated based on the maturity of      the contributing domains associated with that target domain. Accordingly,      when a search engine receives a search query, results may be ordered      based at least in part on the domain rankings.</p>
<p>BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING</p>
<p>[0008]The present invention is described in detail below with reference to      the attached drawing figures, wherein:</p>
<p>[0009]FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an exemplary computing environment      suitable for use in implementing the present invention;</p>
<p>[0010]FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an exemplary system in which      embodiments of the present invention may be employed;</p>
<p>[0011]FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an exemplary search engine in      accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;</p>
<p>[0012]FIG. 4 is a flow diagram showing a method for ranking a domain in      accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; and</p>
<p>[0013]FIG. 5. is a flow diagram showing a method for presenting search      results in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.</p>
<p>DETAILED DESCRIPTION</p>
<p>[0014]The subject matter of the present invention is described with      specificity herein to meet statutory requirements. However, the      description itself is not intended to limit the scope of this patent.      Rather, the inventors have contemplated that the claimed subject matter      might also be embodied in other ways, to include different steps or      combinations of steps similar to the ones described in this document, in      conjunction with other present or future technologies. Moreover, although      the terms &#8220;step&#8221; and/or &#8220;block&#8221; may be used herein to connote different      elements of methods employed, the terms should not be interpreted as      implying any particular order among or between various steps herein      disclosed unless and except when the order of individual steps is      explicitly described.</p>
<p>Overview</p>
<p>[0015]Embodiments of the present invention provide an approach for ranking      a domain based on the maturity of contributing domains associated with      the domain. By way of example only and not limitation, a maturity of a      contributing domain may be based on the date that the contributing domain      was registered or the date that the contributing domain was first      discovered by a search engine.</p>
<p>[0016]Less mature (i.e., newer) domains typically have a higher likelihood      of being spam and/or being a part of a web farm that attempts to      artificially inflate domain rankings for domains in the web farm.      Accordingly, by taking into account the maturity of contributing domains      when determining a rank for a domain, embodiments of the present      invention provide domain rankings in which more relevant and useful      domains may be ranked higher than spam domains and/or less relevant      domains.</p>
<p>[0017]Accordingly, in one aspect, an embodiment of the present invention      is directed to a method for ranking a domain. The method includes      receiving a list of one or more contributing domains associated with the      domain. The method also includes determining a maturity for at least one      of the contributing domains. The method further includes calculating a      rank for the domain based at least in part on the maturity for the      contributing domain.</p>
<p>[0018]In another aspect of the invention, an embodiment is directed to a      method for presenting search results. The method includes receiving      information associated with a number of domains. The method also includes      determining a maturity for each of one or more contributing domains      associated with each domain. The method further includes calculating a      rank for each of the domains based at least in part on the maturity for      the contributing domains associated with the each domain. The method also      includes generating one or more search results that include domains that      match a search query. The method still further includes presenting the      search results in accordance with ranks of the domains that match the      search query.</p>
<p>[0019]In a further aspect, an embodiment of the present invention is      directed to a search engine for ranking search results. The search engine      includes a ranking component configured to determine one or more      contributing domains associated with each of a number of domains. The      ranking component is also configured to determine a maturity for each of      the contributing domains and to calculate a rank for each of the domains      based at least in part on the maturity for at least one of the      contributing domains. The search engine also includes a searching      component configured to perform a search in response to a search query      and to return one or more search results comprising at least one of the      domains that match the search query.</p>
<p>Exemplary Operating Environment</p>
<p>[0020]Referring to the drawings in general and initially to FIG. 1 in      particular, an exemplary operating environment for implementing      embodiments of the present invention is shown and designated generally as      computing device 100. Computing device 100 is but one example of a      suitable computing environment and is not intended to suggest any      limitation as to the scope of use or functionality of the invention.      Neither should the computing device 100 be interpreted as having any      dependency or requirement relating to any one or combination of      components illustrated.</p>
<p>[0021]The invention may be described in the general context of computer      code or machine-useable instructions, including computer-executable      instructions such as program modules, being executed by a computer or      other machine, such as a personal data assistant or other handheld      device. Generally, program modules including routines, programs, objects,      components, data structures, etc., refer to code that perform particular      tasks or implement particular abstract data types. The invention may be      practiced in a variety of system configurations, including hand-held      devices, consumer electronics, general-purpose computers, more specialty      computing devices, etc. The invention may also be practiced in      distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by      remote-processing devices that are linked through a communications      network.</p>
<p>[0022]Computing device 100 includes a bus 110 that directly or indirectly      couples the following devices: memory 112, one or more processors 114,      one or more presentation components 116, input/output (I/O) ports 118,      I/O components 120, and an illustrative power supply 122. Bus 110      represents what may be one or more busses (such as an address bus, data      bus, or combination thereof). Although the various blocks of FIG. 1 are      shown with lines for the sake of clarity, in reality, delineating various      components is not so clear, and metaphorically, the lines would more      accurately be grey and fuzzy. For example, one may consider a      presentation component such as a display device to be an I/O component.      Also, processors have memory. We recognize that such is the nature of the      art, and reiterate that the diagram of FIG. 1 is merely illustrative of      an exemplary computing device that can be used in connection with one or      more embodiments of the present invention. Distinction is not made      between such categories as &#8220;workstation,&#8221; &#8220;server,&#8221; &#8220;laptop,&#8221; &#8220;hand-held      device,&#8221; etc., as all are contemplated within the scope of FIG. 1 and      reference to &#8220;computing device.&#8221;</p>
<p>[0023]Computing device 100 typically includes a variety of      computer-readable media. By way of example, and not limitation,      computer-readable media may comprises Random Access Memory (RAM); Read      Only Memory (ROM); Electronically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory      (EEPROM); flash memory or other memory technologies; CDROM, digital      versatile disks (DVD) or other optical or holographic media; magnetic      cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage      devices, carrier wave, or any other medium that can be used to encode      desired information and be accessed by computing device 100.</p>
<p>[0024]Memory 112 includes computer-storage media in the form of volatile      and/or nonvolatile memory. The memory may be removable, nonremovable, or      a combination thereof. Exemplary hardware devices include solid-state      memory, hard drives, optical-disc drives, etc. Computing device 100      includes one or more processors that read data from various entities such      as memory 112 or I/O components 120. Presentation component(s) 116      present data indications to a user or other device. Exemplary      presentation components include a display device, speaker, printing      component, vibrating component, etc.</p>
<p>[0025]I/O port(s) 118 allow computing device 100 to be logically coupled      to other devices including I/O components 120, some of which may be built      in. Illustrative components include a microphone, joystick, game pad,      satellite dish, scanner, printer, wireless device, etc.</p>
<p>Exemplary System</p>
<p>[0026]Referring now to FIG. 2, a block diagram is provided illustrating an      exemplary system 200 in which embodiments of the present invention may be      employed. It should be understood that this and other arrangements      described herein are set forth only as examples. Other arrangements and      elements (e.g., machines, interfaces, functions, orders, and groupings of      functions, etc.) can be used in addition to or instead of those shown,      and some elements may be omitted altogether. Further, many of the      elements described herein are functional entities that may be implemented      as discrete or distributed components or in conjunction with other      components, and in any suitable combination and location. Various      functions described herein as being performed by one or more entities may      be carried out by hardware, firmware, and/or software. For instance,      various functions may be carried out by a processor executing      instructions stored in memory.</p>
<p>[0027]Among other components not shown, the system 200 may include      multiple client devices, such as client device 202, multiple source      devices, such as source device 204, and a search engine 208. Each of the      client devices, source devices, and search engine may be any type of      computing device, such as computing device 100 described with reference      to FIG. 1, for example. The components may communicate with each other      via a network 206, which may include, without limitation, one or more      local area networks (LANs) and/or wide area networks (WANs). Such      networking environments are commonplace in offices, enterprise-wide      computer networks, intranets, and the Internet. It should be understood      that any number of client devices, source devices, search engines, and      networks may be employed within system 200 within the scope of the      present invention.</p>
<p>[0028]Source devices, such as the source device 204, may maintain a      variety of domains. For example, the source device 204 may be a web      server that maintains multiple domains. The search engine 208 may access      domain information by communicating with these source devices. For      example, the search engine 208 may periodically crawl the source device      204 to access and/or update domain information, such as domain      registration date, domain expiration date, domain swapping date(s), and a      set of linked domains.</p>
<p>[0029]The search engine 208 accesses domain information from the multitude      of source devices, such as the source device 204, and determines a rank      for each of the domains maintained by the source devices. The ranks may      be used to sort the domains when users access the search engine 208 to      search for particular domains through the client device 202.</p>
<p>[0030]Referring now to FIG. 3, an exemplary search engine 300 in      accordance with an embodiment of the present invention will be described      in further detail. Among other components not shown, the search engine      may include a searching component 302, a ranking component 304, a      database 308, and a user interface component 306. Each component may      comprise a program, routine, application, or other machine-executable      code capable of performing the actions discussed herein. One skilled in      the art will recognize that the components shown in FIG. 3 are provided      for illustrative purposes only and other arrangements may be provided in      accordance with various embodiments of the present invention.</p>
<p>[0031]Generally, the search engine 300 may receive search queries from      client devices, such as the client device 202 of FIG. 2, via the user      interface component 306. The user interface component 306 may communicate      to receive search queries from client devices and pass the search queries      to the searching component 302 for performing searches. The user      interface component 306 may also communicate to receive search results      from the searching component 302 and return the search results to the      client devices.</p>
<p>[0032]The searching component 302 may receive a search query from the user      interface component 306 and perform a search to generate search results      comprising domains stored in the database 308 that match the search query      in accordance with the ranks of the domains. The searching component 302      may also return the search results to the user interface component 306,      which may generate a search results user interface and provide the search      results user interface to the requesting client device.</p>
<p>[0033]The ranking component 304 may collect information associated with      various domains from one or more source devices, such as the source      device 204 of FIG. 2, by, for example, crawling the source devices. The      ranking component 304 may determine contributing domains associated with      each domain, determine a maturity for each of the contributing domains,      and calculate a rank for each domain based on the maturity of the      contributing domains associated with a respective domain. In some      embodiments, the ranking component 304 may also save domain information      and domain ranks in the database 308. In some embodiments, the maturity      of a contributing domain is determined based on the date that the      contributing domain was registered or the date that the contributing      domain was first discovered by a search engine (e.g., when domain      information does not readily provide a registration date). In some      embodiments, determining the maturity of a domain also includes      identifying the domain as either a mature domain or an immature domain.      For example, all contributing domains that were registered more than a      year ago may be identified as mature domains.</p>
<p>[0034]In some embodiments, a domain&#8217;s rank is calculated based in part on      only mature contributing domains that are associated with the domain. For      example, suppose a target domain called ClickHereForSearch.com is linked      to by four other domains, Yahoo.com, MSN.com, CNN.com, and      SearchesRus.com. Suppose further that the first three domains have been      registered for more than one year while SearchesRus.com is a new domain      that was registered less than two months ago. If, in the present example,      a mature domain is defined as a domain that has been registered for more      than a year without being expired or swapped, the domains, Yahoo.com,      MSN.com, and CNN.com, would be identified as mature domains while      SearchesRus.com would not. A rank for ClickHereForSearch.com may then be      calculated based on linking from Yahoo.com, MSN.com, and CNN.com only      (i.e., the mature domains) because SearchesRus.com is not a mature      domain.</p>
<p>[0035]In other embodiments, a domain&#8217;s rank may be calculated based, at      least in part, on the presence of both mature and immature contributing      domains. In such embodiments, the contribution of immature domains to a      target domain&#8217;s rank would be based only on the rank that the immature      contributing domains received from mature domains associated with the      immature contributing domains. Such embodiments recognize that although      new domains often tend to be spam, not all new domains are spam and that,      in fact, there are typically new domains that provide great utility.      These embodiments assure that immature domains that quickly gather      popularity for their utility are allowed to contribute rank that is      accumulated from mature domains associated with the immature domains.</p>
<p>[0036]Referring back to ClickHereForSearch.com example, suppose that      SearchesRus.com is a new domain that quickly gathered many other domain      owners&#8217; attention for its unique search algorithms. Suppose further that      popular and/or trusted domains (i.e., mature domains), such as ABC.com,      Harvard.edu, and USPS.com, include at least one link to SearchesRus.com      in addition to a slew of other new domains. In the present embodiment, a      rank for ClickHereForSearch.com may be calculated based not only on the      contribution from the mature domains, Yahoo.com, MSN.com, and CNN.com,      but also on a rank of SearchesRus.com, which was calculated based only on      ranks of its mature contributing domains, ABC.com, Harvard.edu, and      USPS.com.</p>
<p>[0037]In further embodiments, instead of identifying each contributing      domain as either a mature or immature domain to determine its      contribution to a target domain&#8217;s rank, each contributing domain&#8217;s      maturity (e.g., the age of each contributing domain) may be used to      determine the extent of the contributing domain&#8217;s contribution to the      target domain&#8217;s rank. In other words, a target domain&#8217;s rank may be      calculated based in part on a fraction of ranks of contributing domains      associated with the domain. The fraction of each contributing domain&#8217;s      rank used to determine the target domain&#8217;s rank corresponds to the      maturity (e.g., age) of the contributing domain. For example, in an      embodiment, domains that have been registered for more than ten years may      contribute 100% of their accumulated ranks to a target domain&#8217;s rank;      domains that have been registered from six to ten years may contribute      75% of their accumulated ranks to a target domain&#8217;s rank; domains that      have been registered from three to six years may contribute 50% of their      accumulated ranks to a target domain&#8217;s rank; domains that have been      registered for one to three years may contribute 25% of their accumulated      ranks to a target domain&#8217;s rank; and domains that have been registered      for less than one year may only contribute 10% of their accumulated      ranks.</p>
<p>[0038]Referring again to ClickHereForSearch.com example, suppose that      Yahoo.com has been registered for more than ten years; CNN.com has been      registered for seven years; MSN.com has been registered for four years;      and SearchesRus.com has been registered for less than one year. The rank      for ClickHereForSearch.com may be calculated based on 100% of the      accumulated rank for Yahoo.com, 75% of the accumulated rank for CNN.com,      50% of the accumulated rank for MSN.com, and 10% of the accumulated rank      for SearchesRus.com.</p>
<p>Exemplary Methods</p>
<p>[0039]FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating a method 400 for ranking a      domain in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. At      block 402, contributing domains associated with a target domain are      determined. Typically, the contributing domains are a set of domains that      include one or more links to the target domain. As indicated above, in      some embodiments, the search engine 208 periodically crawls the source      devices, such as the source device 204, and collects new domain      information and updates existing domain information. Such information may      be used to identify contributing domains associated with the target      domain.</p>
<p>[0040]At block 404, the maturity for each of the contributing domains      associated with the target domain is determined. In general, a maturity      of a domain is determined based on how long the domain has been known to      exist. Typically, a maturity of a domain is determined based on the date      that the domain was registered or the date that the domain was first      discovered by a search engine (e.g., if the registration date cannot be      ascertained).</p>
<p>[0041]As indicated above, in some embodiments, one or more of the      contributing domains are identified as mature domains based on the      maturity of the contributing domains. For example, all domains that were      registered more than a year ago may be defined as mature domains.      Similarly, in some embodiments, one or more of the contributing domains      are determined to be immature domains based on the maturity of the      contributing domains. For example, all domains that were registered or      discovered for the first time by a search engine less than a year ago may      be determined to be immature. In some embodiments, a maturity of a domain      is reset if the domain expires or if the domain is swapped. Domain      registration is typically based on year-to-year basis. Domain owners are      required to pay an annual fee for keeping their domains. Domains will      expire if the annual fees are not paid. Expired domains can, thereafter,      be purchased by different owners. Spammers may purchase a block of      domains that have been expired as well as new domains to form a Web Farm.      Domain swapping occurs when domain users trade their domains. Spammers      may take advantage of swapping by swapping their domains for domains that      have not been tainted. Spammers may be further prevented from escaping      preventive measures based on maturity of domains by resetting the      maturity of the domains that have expired or have been swapped.</p>
<p>[0042]At block 406, a rank for the target domain is calculated. As      indicated above, in some embodiments, only mature contributing domains      are used to calculate the rank for the target domain. In other words,      only contributing domains that have been identified as mature domains by      meeting a predetermined minimum period of existence may contribute to the      rank of the target domain. For example, suppose that a spammer purchases      one hundred domains and has each of the one hundred domains include links      to the remaining ninety nine domains. This extensive interlinking would      typically afford each of the one hundred domains a potential to receive a      high rank based on the number of domains that include a link thereto even      though all one hundred of the domains may be less than a month old.      However, the present embodiment prevents these contributing domains that      have not been registered for more than a minimum period of time to      qualify as mature domains. Accordingly, by not qualifying as mature      domains in some embodiments, each of the one hundred spam domains may be      successfully stopped from contributing ranks to the remaining ninety nine      spam domain accumulating ranks.</p>
<p>[0043]In other embodiments, the target domain&#8217;s rank may be determined      based on both mature contributing domains and immature contributing      domains. However, in such embodiment, immature contributing domains      contribute to the target domain&#8217;s rank only to the extent that the      immature contributing domains have received rank from mature domains      associated with the immature domains. For example, suppose that a mature      domain is defined as a domain that has been registered for more than six      months without being expired or swapped and that a target domain called      ChildrensWorld.com is linked to by two other domains, ToysRus.com and      NewToyCompany.com. NewToyCompany.com is a new domain that was registered      less than a month ago, but is linked to by two mature domains, Kmart.com      and Target.com, in addition to other newer domains. A rank for the target      domain may be calculated based on a rank of NewToyCompany.com, which was      calculated based only on ranks of the two mature contributing domains,      Kmart.com and Target.com, in addition to the rank of ToysRus.com, which      is a mature domain.</p>
<p>[0044]In further embodiments, the target domain&#8217;s rank is determined not      by identifying mature and immature contributing domains, but by      determining the extent of a contributing domain&#8217;s contribution based on      its maturity. Such embodiments provide a sliding scale approach based on      contributing domain maturity. In such embodiments, a fraction may be      determined for each contributing domain based on its maturity and applied      to determine that respective contributing domain&#8217;s contribution to the      target domain&#8217;s rank. For example, contributing domains that have been      registered for a longer period of time (i.e., have a greater maturity)      may contribute more to a target domain&#8217;s rank than contributing domains      that have been registered for a shorter period of time (i.e., have a      lesser maturity).</p>
<p>[0045]FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating a method 500 for presenting      search results in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.      At block 502, a search query is received at a search engine, such as the      search engine 208 of FIG. 2, from a client device, such as the client      device 202 of FIG. 2. At block 504, one or more search results are      determined for the search query using domains that have been previously      received or collected and stored in a database, such as the database 308      of FIG. 3. For example, the search engine may search the database and      select one or more domains stored therein that match the search query.</p>
<p>[0046]At block 506, a search results user interface is generated using      domain rankings to determine an order for the search results. For      example, the search results may be presented with the higher ranked      domains at the top such that users would see more reliable and/or popular      domains first. Typically, ranks for the domains have already been      determined and stored in the database prior to being used for ordering      the search results. The domain rankings may have been generated in a      manner similar to the embodiments described hereinabove with reference to      FIG. 4. The search result user interface is then communicated from the      search engine to the client device for presentation on the client device,      as shown at block 508. Advantageously, the present invention&#8217;s approaches      to ranking domains may be used to assist search engines to rank domains      in accordance with the popularity and utility of the domains while      preventing spam domains from earning undeservedly high ranks.</p>
<p>CONCLUSION</p>
<p>[0047]Embodiments of the present invention relate to, among other things,      ranking a domain. One or more contributing domains associated with a      target domain are identified and the maturity of the contributing domains      is determined. By way of example only and not limitation, the maturity of      a contributing domain may be determined based on the date that it was      registered or the date that it was first discovered by a search engine.      In turn, the maturity of the contributing domains may be used to      calculate a rank for the target domain.</p>
<p>[0048]The present invention has been described in relation to particular      embodiments, which are intended in all respects to be illustrative rather      than restrictive. Alternative embodiments will become apparent to those      of ordinary skill in the art to which the present invention pertains      without departing from its scope.</p>
<p>[0049]From the foregoing, it will be seen that this invention is one well      adapted to attain all the ends and objects set forth above, together with      other advantages which are obvious and inherent to the system and method.      It will be understood that certain features and subcombinations are of      utility and may be employed without reference to other features and      subcombinations. This is contemplated by and is within the scope of the      claims.</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-1162"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/ranking-domains-domain-maturity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mobile, Domains, and the Future</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/mobile-domains-future/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/mobile-domains-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeff selig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary & Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobi parking service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bostonmediadomain.com/?p=503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve heard quite a bit of negative comments on MOBI&#8217;s at the TRAFFIC Conference, but from what I could glean, nothing actually concrete.  Everything is speculative, both positive and negative.  I have good contacts in the mobi industry, and have met a few times with folks from dotmobi itself, and it seems to be the best run registry I have ever encountered&#8230; The technology is available but the sheer volume of developed websites is not, and vice-versa, the developed websites aren&#8217;t done because the technology isn&#8217;t done&#8230;  It does seem, however, that the mobi industry and investors are very aware of the problem, which is certainly the first step&#8230;  I personally have some mobi investments and all my research spurred me on to do light development on mine&#8230; 1. Free mobi parking service where you receive 100% of the revenue: http://mobisitetrader.com/domain-parking.php 2. Free mobi templates for creating sites: http://mobisitegalore.com/ 3. Here&#8217;s a link to the FREE ebook about Mobile, Domains, and the Future. I&#8217;m a third of the way done and think it&#8217;s excellent. http://trendinews.com/mobile_domains_future_javier_marti.pdf 4. Nubiq&#8217;s new Zinadoo mobile web site builder and other free mobi services http://www.zinadoo.com/Services/Prices.htm]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bostonmediadomain.com%2Fmobile-domains-future%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bostonmediadomain.com%2Fmobile-domains-future%2F&amp;source=seosem&amp;style=normal&amp;service=is.gd&amp;hashtags=Domains,mobi+parking+service,Mobile&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana; color: #000000;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana; color: #000000;"></span></span></p>
<div><span style="font-family: Verdana; color: #000000; font-size: 10pt;">We&#8217;ve heard quite a bit of negative comments on MOBI&#8217;s at the TRAFFIC Conference, but from what I could glean, nothing actually concrete.  Everything is speculative, both positive and negative.  I have good contacts in the mobi industry, and have met a few times with folks from dotmobi itself, and it seems to be the best run registry I have ever encountered&#8230; The technology is available but the sheer volume of developed websites is not, and vice-versa, the developed websites aren&#8217;t done because the technology isn&#8217;t done&#8230;  It does seem, however, that the mobi industry and investors are very aware of the problem, which is certainly the first step&#8230;  I personally have some mobi investments and all my research spurred me on to do light development on mine&#8230; </span></div>
<div></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Verdana; color: #000000; font-size: 10pt;"></span>1. Free mobi parking service where you receive 100% of the revenue:</div>
<div><span style="color: #0000ff;"><a href="http://mobisitetrader.com/domain-parking.php" target="_blank">http://mobisitetrader.com/domain-parking.php</a></span></div>
<div>2. Free mobi templates for creating sites:</div>
<div><span style="color: #0000ff;"><a href="http://mobisitegalore.com/" target="_blank">http://mobisitegalore.com/</a></span></div>
<div>3. Here&#8217;s a link to the FREE ebook about Mobile, Domains, and the Future.  I&#8217;m a third of the way done and think it&#8217;s excellent.</div>
<div><a href="http://trendinews.com/mobile_domains_future_javier_marti.pdf" target="_blank">http://trendinews.com/mobile_domains_future_javier_marti.pdf</a></div>
<div>4. Nubiq&#8217;s new Zinadoo mobile web site builder and other free mobi services <a href="http://www.zinadoo.com/Services/Prices.htm" target="_blank">http://www.zinadoo.com/Services/Prices.htm</a></div>
<div class="shr-publisher-503"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/mobile-domains-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 Reasons to Invest in a Domain Name for Your Business -</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/5-reasons-to-invest-in-a-domain-name-for-your-business/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/5-reasons-to-invest-in-a-domain-name-for-your-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 23:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeff selig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary & Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Need]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bostonmediadomain.com/2008/05/27/5-reasons-to-invest-in-a-domain-name-for-your-business/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Small Business Owner, Tough economic times call for small businesses to get creative and acquiring a domain name is an important first step in building a successful online business. If your business isn&#8217;t already online, here are 5 reasons why purchasing a domain name just might be the solution you need. DomainsforSaleandRent.com has a large inventory of premium names  let us help you find one that matches your business needs. 1. COST The cost of acquiring a premium domain names is cheaper than continuously paying for local or regional print advertising. 2. THE INTERNET IS KING Customers now look to the internet first where they can find you 24/7. When was the last time you flipped through the Yellow Pages? 3. GEOGRAPHY You can immediately reach a broader market with the Internet because your site is always available to all potential customers no matter what time it is where they are. 4. CUSTOMER CONTACT You can more easily stay in touch with your prospects and customers by gathering their email address and interests directly from your website. 5. MEASUREABLE AND FLEXIBLE MARKETING OPTIONS Online advertising is easy to track and adjust based on your budget. Dial up or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bostonmediadomain.com%2F5-reasons-to-invest-in-a-domain-name-for-your-business%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bostonmediadomain.com%2F5-reasons-to-invest-in-a-domain-name-for-your-business%2F&amp;source=seosem&amp;style=normal&amp;service=is.gd&amp;hashtags=advertising,Budget,Domain,Domain+name,domain+names,Domains,email,GA,HTTP,interest,Internet,ip,marketing,Matt,Need,Page,Reach,ROS,Title,Traffic,web&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Dear Small Business Owner,</p>
<p>Tough economic times call for small businesses to get creative and acquiring a domain name is an important first step in building a successful online business. If your business isn&#8217;t already online, here are 5 reasons why purchasing a domain name just might be the solution you need. <a href="http://DomainsforSaleandRent.com" title="DomainsforSaleandRent.com">DomainsforSaleandRent.com</a> has a large inventory of premium names  let us help you find one that matches your business needs.</p>
<p>1. COST<br />
The cost of acquiring a premium domain names is cheaper than continuously paying for local or regional print advertising.</p>
<p>2. THE INTERNET IS KING<br />
Customers now look to the internet first where they can find you 24/7. When was the last time you flipped through the Yellow Pages?</p>
<p>3. GEOGRAPHY<br />
You can immediately reach a broader market with the Internet because your site is always available to all potential customers no matter what time it is where they are.</p>
<p>4. CUSTOMER CONTACT<br />
You can more easily stay in touch with your prospects and customers by gathering their email address and interests directly from your website.</p>
<p>5. MEASUREABLE AND FLEXIBLE MARKETING OPTIONS<br />
Online advertising is easy to track and adjust based on your budget. Dial up or dial down your marketing efforts depending on how well they are generating traffic.</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-412"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/5-reasons-to-invest-in-a-domain-name-for-your-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taking Your Blog To The Next Level; I like WordPress</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/taking-your-blog-to-the-next-level-i-like-wordpress/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/taking-your-blog-to-the-next-level-i-like-wordpress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 00:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeff selig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary & Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affiliate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affiliate Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bookmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Client]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Description]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[factors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Sitemaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HITS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JavaScript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyword]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Need]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plugins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[posting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ranking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Script]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitemap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sponsorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[themes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bostonmediadomain.com/2008/05/13/taking-your-blog-to-the-next-level-i-like-wordpress/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you already have your own blog, or are thinking of setting one up, you&#8217;ve undoubtedly read one or more of the beginner&#8217;s guides to blogging that frequent the Internet. Blog often and provide unique, fresh, entertaining, accurate, and relevant information. That&#8217;s the content of virtually all of those articles, but this information is only going to get you so far. The information they provide will help you drive traffic to your blog, as long as you stick at it, and some of the more in depth articles may even give you a basic shove in the right gold paved direction. However, there will come a time when you&#8217;re ready to take your blog to the next level. WordPress And Why We Believe It&#8217;s Essential For A Successful Blog First off, I feel this has to be said &#8211; if you&#8217;re not using WordPress then it&#8217;s highly likely that you&#8217;re missing out. WordPress has the biggest collection of plug-ins, themes, and other features of any blogging platform and, of course, it&#8217;s free. Rather than spend money on using another blogging platform, save your dollars to pay for a custom design or get help with marketing. What Plug-ins Do For You [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bostonmediadomain.com%2Ftaking-your-blog-to-the-next-level-i-like-wordpress%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bostonmediadomain.com%2Ftaking-your-blog-to-the-next-level-i-like-wordpress%2F&amp;source=seosem&amp;style=normal&amp;service=is.gd&amp;hashtags=advertising,affiliate,Affiliate+Network,app,blog,Blogger,Bookmark,Brin,buy,Client,content,data,Description,Domain,Domains,factors,Feed,Feeds,Free,GA,google,Google+Sitemaps,Hit,HITS,HTTP,IAB,interest,Internet,ip,JavaScript,keyword,Link,links,maps,marketing,Need,optimization,Page,Ping,plugins,Post,posting,ranking,Script,search,Search+Engine,search+engines,sell,SEO,share,Sitemap,Sponsorship,stats,Tag,themes,Title,Traffic,Visit,web,wordpress&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>If you already have your own blog, or are thinking of setting one up, you&#8217;ve undoubtedly read one or more of the beginner&#8217;s guides to blogging that frequent the Internet. Blog often and provide unique, fresh, entertaining, accurate, and relevant information. That&#8217;s the content of virtually all of those articles, but this information is only going to get you so far.</p>
<p>The information they provide will help you drive traffic to your blog, as long as you stick at it, and some of the more in depth articles may even give you a basic shove in the right gold paved direction. However, there will come a time when you&#8217;re ready to take your blog to the next level.</p>
<p>WordPress And Why We Believe It&#8217;s Essential For A Successful Blog</p>
<p>First off, I feel this has to be said &#8211; if you&#8217;re not using WordPress then it&#8217;s highly likely that you&#8217;re missing out. WordPress has the biggest collection of plug-ins, themes, and other features of any blogging platform and, of course, it&#8217;s free. Rather than spend money on using another blogging platform, save your dollars to pay for a custom design or get help with marketing.</p>
<p>What Plug-ins Do For You</p>
<p>Plug-in&#8217;s represent the greatest time saving addition to your blog, as well as the greatest opportunity to add increased features and functions that will help you take your blog to the next level. To really succeed in blogging for money, you need to start treating your blog like any website owner treats their website. This means you have to look at it like a business.</p>
<p>A Small Selection Of Top Notch Plug-in&#8217;s</p>
<p>WordPress plugins offer a huge range of different functions and features that you couldn&#8217;t otherwise obtain. We&#8217;ve listed a few of what we believe to be the more important here but there are many others:</p>
<p>Google Sitemaps &#8211; The Google Sitemaps plugin automatically creates an XML sitemap, which can be submitted to many of the major search engines. It will also automatically inform them (ping) when you add any new posts or pages to your blog.</p>
<p>Firestats &#8211; There are several in-depth stat packages available as plugins but our personal favorite is the Firestats package. It is crucial that you track and act on the stats for your website. Knowing how your readers found your site can help you with promotion and improve your profit levels by giving you a clearer picture of exactly what your visitors are looking for. It&#8217;s also good to know the topics that are working out and those that aren&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Social Bookmarking &#8211; The social bookmarking plugin adds the links to the bottom of your posts that lets readers quickly and conveniently bookmark a post with their preferred social bookmarking site. Some of these sites can help you generate traffic and even improve your search ranking.<br />
<span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px"><br />
<script type="text/javascript"><!-- google_ad_client = "pub-7751573050721168"; /* 300x250, created 5/19/08 */ google_ad_slot = "4521805693"; google_ad_width = 300; google_ad_height = 250; //--> </script><br />
<script src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js" type="text/javascript"> </script></span><br />
All In One SEO &#8211; The All In One SEO plugin enables you to add a title, description, and keywords to each of your posts. These can help improve search engine results and make your posts appear cleaner in the search results. It can also be used to ensure that visitors are highly targeted.</p>
<p>Related Entries &#8211; It&#8217;s important to get traffic flowing around your posts because the more of your site a person views, the more likely they will be to click affiliate links or Adsense links. If your blog is entirely related to your business, they will be more likely to buy your products or pay for your services.</p>
<p>Adsense Deluxe &#8211; Don&#8217;t let the name fool you. Adsense Deluxe provides a fast and efficient method of adding Adsense code to any post or page, with just a single tag, but it also does the same for Yahoo Publisher Network (YPN) ads.</p>
<p>Comment Subscription &#8211; The big benefit of a blog is that you can often persuade interested visitors to keep returning to your corner of the net. The comment subscription plug in further enables them to sign up and be notified of any responses to comments they have added.</p>
<p>Monetizing Your Blog</p>
<p>If you want to make money from your blog and you have a reasonable amount of traffic then the methods of advertising you use will quickly become an important topic to you. There are a lot of different ways to monetize a blog, and it would be damaging of me to try and tell you exactly what method will work without knowing at least a little about your blog. However, there are some things we will willingly share.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t Sell Out &#8211; There&#8217;s a temptation for those with more mature blogs to write a post and review an item, website, or service and get paid for doing so. Our opinion on this can be summed up in pretty much one word or two; &#8220;don&#8217;t&#8221; or &#8220;do not&#8221;. You might think that you can write a genuinely informative piece and be completely open and honest without your readers ever realizing what you are doing but it is highly unlikely that this is the case.</p>
<p>Sponsorship &#8211; Sponsored advertising is a great way to monetize some blogs. Generally speaking (and there are exceptions), the more specific the topic of a blog, the more likely this will prove to be a viable advertising solution and it may be easier to bag sponsored ads than you think. And, because this is WordPress, there are plugins that help you do it too (AdServe is a good one).</p>
<p>Affiliate Data Feeds &#8211; Most affiliate networks have some form of data feed or affiliate feed. If you intend to promote affiliate programs then make the most of these, but ensure that the feed fits with your site. Don&#8217;t just slap up a bit of code and expect it to miraculously turn your hobby blog into a multi-million dollar, award winning blog because it takes careful planning, ad placement optimization, and some trial and error to get the best results. Guess what? There are numerous plugins to use with the Amazon affiliate program and other programs so make the most of them.</p>
<p>Blog Networks</p>
<p>The final point we&#8217;re going to cover in this, now extensive, article is whether or not you should join a blog network. A blog network is, unsurprisingly, a network of blogs. The overall aim and the method that connects the blogs differs with each network. Some may be connected by having different subdomains on the same main domain. Others may simply use the same banner. Similarly, some networks are established to bring profit to bloggers and (understandably) to the network owner. Other networks want nothing more than to promote a near state of hippie euphoria over one particular topic.</p>
<p>To Join Or Not To Join</p>
<p>It seems to have become a habit but we can&#8217;t honestly tell you whether you should definitely join, or definitely not join, a blogging network. They work out for some by providing traffic, improving search rankings, and even helping out with the general blogging process. However, other blogs would fare better on their own, especially the more popular ones. Similarly, some networks are so powerful that they can generate thousands of hits to a blog instantly before you even submit a post, while your blog may carry a smaller network if you have good traffic levels.</p>
<p>The reason that a lot of bloggers do join a network is so that they can network with other bloggers. It provides a sense of belonging and can help develop blogging relationships. If you get invited or accepted into a particularly large network then you should consider trying it because it really can pay dividends but be warned that the large networks have pretty stringent guidelines that you must adhere to in order to be accepted.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s Next For Your Blog?</p>
<p>This article covers some of the blogging factors that you need to look at when you consider taking your blog to the next level. Simply posting good content will often help you build traffic, but that&#8217;s really all it will do. You need to monetize that traffic, and where possible, keep it returning over and over again. You should also employ some methods of further building your traffic, other than posting good posts.</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-408"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/taking-your-blog-to-the-next-level-i-like-wordpress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virus247.com; trying something new in keywords and affiliate marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/virus247com-trying-something-new-in-keywords-and-affiliate-marketing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/virus247com-trying-something-new-in-keywords-and-affiliate-marketing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 21:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeff selig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary & Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bostonmediadomain.com/?p=405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, so check it.  I am scanning webmaster radio and I hear the guy that started the website &#8220;cool site of the day&#8221; offering free consultations for the first bunch of folk that contact him.   I email him and sure enough he sends back his contact information to catch up with him on the tele, good to his word.  The first positive sign! My issues have been as follows as I described to him, I own lots of domains and do not have a lot of time to build them out  maximizing their potential.  Additionally, I keep buying more domains, so as you can see it becomes and exponential problem trying to buy and build at the same time. So many url&#8217;s so little time;-) Parking the domains has not been an ideal revenue generator and the affiliate space has frankly left me cold. Twenty five cents for a lead isn&#8217;t even worth getting out of bed in the morning for as a domainer friend of mine spewed.  And folks, he is correct. I have summarily cut out any affiliate program that was getting more from me than I was from them. On to http://www.Virus247.com and the progress I have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bostonmediadomain.com%2Fvirus247com-trying-something-new-in-keywords-and-affiliate-marketing%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bostonmediadomain.com%2Fvirus247com-trying-something-new-in-keywords-and-affiliate-marketing%2F&amp;source=seosem&amp;style=normal&amp;service=is.gd&amp;hashtags=Domains&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Ok, so check it.  I am scanning webmaster radio and I hear the guy that started the website &#8220;cool site of the day&#8221; offering free consultations for the first bunch of folk that contact him.   I email him and sure enough he sends back his contact information to catch up with him on the tele, good to his word.  The first positive sign!</p>
<p>My issues have been as follows as I described to him, I own lots of domains and do not have a lot of time to build them out  maximizing their potential.  Additionally, I keep buying more domains, so as you can see it becomes and exponential problem trying to buy and build at the same time. So many url&#8217;s so little time;-)</p>
<p>Parking the domains has not been an ideal revenue generator and the affiliate space has frankly left me cold. Twenty five cents for a lead isn&#8217;t even worth getting out of bed in the morning for as a domainer friend of mine spewed.  And folks, he is correct. I have summarily cut out any affiliate program that was getting more from me than I was from them.</p>
<p>On to <a title="virus247.com" href="http://www.virus247.com">http://www.Virus247.com</a> and the progress I have made with this new program. Although the results are still not in I feel bullish the direction this guy gave me is the right path and the company, when I called them, was very forth coming in their intent and possible domains to try and test. they recommended some affiliate sites to sign up with and described what was actually generating results in their on-board tests. Choosing  <a title="virus247.com" href="http://www.virus247.com">http://www.Virus247.com</a> as my first test in the affiliate space for software I researched over 11 categories and 5000 keywords for everything involving spam, spyware and virus protection.</p>
<p>Now comes the kicker, getting it all set up. As usual with the affiliate programs I am on hold till I get approved by the vendor for their program. Although I do have access to other affiliate programs similar to the one they described I really want to try what they recommended and see if it works like they say, given enough time for the search engines to parse and post about a 60 day window.</p>
<p>The part of the program that I liked is you get 10 sub domains you can put up to 500 keywords into.  If you do the quick math, you get 11 domains including the primary, times 500 keywords, which can max you out at 5500 keywords per domain <a title="virus247.com" href="http://www.virus247.com">http://www.Virus247.com</a>, and sub-domains total that the engines will be parsing against. Nice!! gotta work right? I&#8217;ll let you know the results in 60 some odd days. stay tuned!!</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-405"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/virus247com-trying-something-new-in-keywords-and-affiliate-marketing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO Optimization: Basics to great site development</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/seo-optimization-basics-to-towards-great-site-development/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/seo-optimization-basics-to-towards-great-site-development/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 13:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeff selig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary & Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anchor Text]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Backlink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Hat SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blacklist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broken Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloaking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Description]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duplicate Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exact match]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[factors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[follow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frames]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frequency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HITS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inbound Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP Address]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JavaScript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyword]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keyword Density]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keyword Phrase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keyword Stuffing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link Buying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link Farm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mirror Site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Need]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[on page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outbound Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pixel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proximity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ranking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relevancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robots.txt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Script]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitemap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spamming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stemming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Text Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title Tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[URL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bostonmediadomain.com/?p=402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1 Keywords in &#60;title&#62; tag This is one of the most important places to have a keyword because what is written inside the &#60;title&#62; tag shows in search results as your page title. The title tag must be short (6 or 7 words at most) and the the keyword must be near the beginning. +3 2 Keywords in URL Keywords in URLs help a lot &#8211; e.g. &#8211; http://domainname.com/seo-services.html, where &#8220;SEO services&#8221; is the keyword phrase you attempt to rank well for. But if you don&#8217;t have the keywords in other parts of the document, don&#8217;t rely on having them in the URL. +3 3 Keyword density in document text Another very important factor you need to check. 3-7 % for major keywords is best, 1-2 for minor. Keyword density of over 10% is suspicious and looks more like keyword stuffing, than a naturally written text. +3 4 Keywords in anchor text Also very important, especially for the anchor text of inbound links, because if you have the keyword in the anchor text in a link from another site, this is regarded as getting a vote from this site not only about your site in general, but about the keyword [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bostonmediadomain.com%2Fseo-optimization-basics-to-towards-great-site-development%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bostonmediadomain.com%2Fseo-optimization-basics-to-towards-great-site-development%2F&amp;source=seosem&amp;style=normal&amp;service=is.gd&amp;hashtags=adwords,Anchor+Text,app,attention,Backlink,Black+Hat+SEO,Blacklist,blog,Bold,Brin,Broken+Link,Browser,buy,cloak,Cloaking,community,content,Copyright,Description,Directory,Domain,Domain+name,domain+names,Domains,Duplicate+Content,exact+match,factors,Flash,follow,Frames,Free,Frequency,GA,google,Headings,Hit,HITS,Home+Page,html,HTTP,IAB,Impression,Inbound+Link,Index,Internal+Link,ip,IP+Address,isp,JavaScript,keyword,Keyword+Density,Keyword+Phrase,Keyword+Stuffing,Link,Link+Buying,Link+Farm,links,marketing,Matt,Mirror+Site,Navigation,Need,on+page,Opera,optimization,Outbound+Link,Page,Penalty,Pixel,Proximity,ranking,Relevancy,Rob,Robots.txt,RON,ROS,Script,search,Search+Engine,search+engines,SEO,share,Sitemap,Spam,Spamming,Spider,Stemming,Tag,tags,Text+Link,Title,Title+Tag,Traffic,trust,Update,URL,urls,Visit,web,Yahoo%21&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<table class="MsoNormalTable" style="width: 100%" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<tr style="height: 47.25pt">
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%; height: 47.25pt" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%; height: 47.25pt" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keywords   in &lt;title&gt; tag <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%; height: 47.25pt" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">This is   one of the most important places to have a keyword because what is written   inside the &lt;title&gt; tag shows in search results as your page title. The   title tag must be short (6 or 7 words at most) and the the keyword must be   near the beginning. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%; height: 47.25pt" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keywords   in URL<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keywords   in URLs help a lot &#8211; e.g. &#8211; http://domainname.com/seo-services.html,   where &#8220;SEO services&#8221; is the keyword phrase you attempt to rank well   for. But if you don&#8217;t have the keywords in other parts of the document, don&#8217;t   rely on having them in the URL.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keyword   density in document text<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Another   very important factor you need to check. 3-7 %   for major keywords is best, 1-2 for minor. Keyword density of over 10% is   suspicious and looks more like keyword stuffing, than a naturally written   text.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">4<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keywords   in anchor text<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Also very   important, especially for the anchor text of   inbound links, because if you have the keyword in the anchor text in a   link from another site, this is regarded as getting a vote from this site not   only about your site in general, but about the keyword in particular. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">5<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keywords   in headings (&lt;H1&gt;, &lt;H2&gt;, etc. tags)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">One more   place where keywords count a lot. But beware that your page has actual text about   the particular keyword.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">6<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keywords   in the beginning of a document<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Also   counts, though not as much as anchor text, title tag or headings. However,   have in mind that the beginning of a document does not necessarily mean the   first paragraph  for instance if you use tables, the first paragraph of text   might be in the second half of the table.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">7<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keywords   in &lt;alt&gt; tags<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Spiders   don&#8217;t read images but they do read their textual descriptions in the   &lt;alt&gt; tag, so if you have images on your page, fill in the &lt;alt&gt;   tag with some keywords about them. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">8<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keywords   in metatags<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Less and   less important, especially for Google. Yahoo! and MSN still rely on them, so   if you are optimizing for Yahoo! or MSN, fill these tags properly. In any   case, filling these tags properly will not hurt, so do it.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">9<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keyword   proximity<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keyword   proximity measures how close in the text the keywords are. It is best if they   are immediately one after the other (e.g. &#8220;dog food&#8221;), with no   other words between them. For instance, if you have &#8220;dog&#8221; in the   first paragraph and &#8220;food&#8221; in the third paragraph, this also counts   but not as much as having the phrase &#8220;dog food&#8221; without any other   words in between. Keyword proximity is applicable for keyword phrases that   consist of 2 or more words.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">10<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keyword   phrases<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">In   addition to keywords, you can optimize for keyword phrases that consist of   several words  e.g. &#8220;SEO services&#8221;. It is best when the keyword   phrases you optimize for are popular ones, so you can get a lot of exact   matches of the search string but sometimes it makes sense to optimize for 2   or 3 separate keywords (&#8220;SEO&#8221; and &#8220;services&#8221;) than for   one phrase that might occasionally get an exact match.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">11<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Secondary   keywords<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Optimizing   for secondary keywords can be a golden mine because when everybody else is   optimizing for the most popular keywords, there will be less competition (and   probably more hits) for pages that are optimized for the minor words. For   instance, &#8220;real estate new jersey&#8221; might have thousand times less   hits than &#8220;real estate&#8221; only but if you are operating in New Jersey,   you will get less but considerably better targeted traffic. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">12<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keyword   stemming<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">For   English this is not so much of a factor because words that stem from the same   root (e.g. dog, dogs, doggy, etc.) are considered related and if you have &#8220;dog&#8221;   on your page, you will get hits for &#8220;dogs&#8221; and &#8220;doggy&#8221; as   well, but for other languages keywords stemming could be an issue because   different words that stem from the same root are considered as not related   and you might need to optimize for all of them. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">13<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Synonyms<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Optimizing   for synonyms of the target keywords, in addition to the main keywords. This   is good for sites in English, for which search engines are smart enough to   use synonyms as well, when ranking sites but for many other languages   synonyms are not taken into account, when calculating rankings and relevancy.   <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">14<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keyword   Mistypes<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Spelling   errors are very frequent and if you know that your target keywords have   popular misspellings or alternative spellings (i.e. Christmas and Xmas), you   might be tempted to optimize for them. Yes, this might get you some more   traffic but having spelling mistakes on your site does not make a good   impression, so you&#8217;d better don&#8217;t do it, or do it only in the metatags.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">0<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">15<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keyword   dilution <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">When you   are optimizing for an excessive amount of keywords, especially unrelated   ones, this will affect the performance of all your keywords and even the   major ones will be lost (diluted) in the text.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">16<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keyword   stuffing<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Any   artificially inflated keyword density (10% and over) is keyword stuffing and   you risk getting banned from search engines. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td colspan="3" style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 93%" valign="top" width="93%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Links &#8211;   internal, inbound, outbound <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">17<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Anchor   text of inbound links<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">As   discussed in the Keywords section, this is one of the most important factors   for good rankings. It is best if you have a keyword in the anchor text but   even if you don&#8217;t, it is still OK.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">18<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Origin of   inbound links<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Besides   the anchor text, it is important if the site that links to you is a reputable   one or not. Generally sites with greater Google PR are considered reputable. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">19<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Links   from similar sites<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Having   links from similar sites is very, very useful. It indicates that the   competition is voting for you and you are popular within your topical   community. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">20<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Links   from .edu and .gov sites<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">These   links are precious because .edu and .gov sites are more reputable than .com.   .biz, .info, etc. domains. Additionally, such links are hard to obtain. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">21<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Number of   backlinks<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Generally   the more, the better. But the reputation of the sites that link to you is   more important than their number. Also important is their anchor text, is   there a keyword in it, how old are they, etc.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">22<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Anchor   text of internal links<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">This also   matters, though not as much as the anchor text of inbound links.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">23<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Around-the-anchor   text<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">The text   that is immediately before and after the anchor text also matters because it   further indicates the relevance of the link  i.e. if the link is artificial   or it naturally flows in the text. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">24<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Age of   inbound links<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">The   older, the better. Getting many new links in a short time suggests buying   them. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">25<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Links   from directories<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Great,   though it strongly depends on which directories. Being listed in DMOZ, Yahoo   Directory and similar directories is a great boost for your ranking but   having tons of links from PR0 directories is useless and it can even be   regarded as link spamming, if you have hundreds or thousands of such links. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">26<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Number of   outgoing links on the page that links to you<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">The   fewer, the better for you because this way your link looks more important. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">27<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Named   anchors<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Named   anchors (the target place of internal links) are useful for internal   navigation but are also useful for SEO because you stress additionally that a   particular page, paragraph or text is important. In the code, named anchors   look like this: &lt;A href=&#8221;#dogs&#8221;&gt;Read about dogs&lt;/A&gt;   and &#8220;#dogs&#8221; is the named anchor. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">28<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">IP   address of inbound link<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Google   denies that they discriminate against links that come from the same IP   address or C class of addresses, so for Google the IP address can be   considered neutral to the weight of inbound links. However, MSN and Yahoo!   may discard links from the same IPs or IP classes, so it is always better to   get links from different IPs.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">29<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Inbound   links from link farms and other suspicious sites <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">This does   not affect you in any way, provided that the links are not reciprocal. The   idea is that it is beyond your control to define what a link farm links to,   so you don&#8217;t get penalized when such sites link to you because this is not   your fault but in any case you&#8217;d better stay away from link farms and similar   suspicious sites. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">0<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">30<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Many   outgoing links<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Google   does not like pages that consists mainly of links, so you&#8217;d better keep them   under 100 per page. Having many outgoing links does not get you any benefits   in terms of ranking and could even make your situation worse.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">31<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Excessive   linking, link spamming<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">It is bad   for your rankings, when you have many links to/from the same sites (even if   it is not a cross- linking scheme or links to bad neighbors) because it   suggests link buying or at least spamming. In the best case only some of the   links are taken into account for SEO rankings.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">32<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Outbound   links to link farms and other suspicious sites<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Unlike   inbound links from link farms and other suspicious sites, outbound links to bad neighbors   can drown you. You need periodically to check the status of the sites you   link to because sometimes good sites become bad neighbors and vice versa. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">33<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Cross-linking<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Cross-linking   occurs when site A links to site B, site B links to site C and site C links   back to site A. This is the simplest example but more complex schemes are   possible. Cross-linking looks like disguised reciprocal link trading and is   penalized. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">34<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Single   pixel links<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">when you   have a link that is a pixel or so wide it is invisible for humans, so nobody   will click on it and it is obvious that this link is an attempt to manipulate   search engines. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td colspan="3" style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 93%" valign="top" width="93%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Metatags <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">35<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">&lt;Description&gt;   metatag<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Metatags   are becoming less and less important but if there are metatags that still   matter, these are the &lt;description&gt; and &lt;keywords&gt; ones. Use the   &lt;Description&gt; metatag to write the description of your site. Besides   the fact that metatags still rock on MSN and Yahoo!, the &lt;Description&gt;   metatag has one more advantage  it sometimes pops in the description of your   site in search results. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">36<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">&lt;Keywords&gt;   metatag<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">The   &lt;Keywords&gt; metatag also matters, though as all metatags it gets almost   no attention from Google and some attention from MSN and Yahoo! Keep the   metatag reasonably long  10 to 20 keywords at most. Don&#8217;t stuff the   &lt;Keywords&gt; tag with keywords that you don&#8217;t have on the page, this is   bad for your rankings. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">37<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">&lt;Language&gt;   metatag<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">If your   site is language-specific, don&#8217;t leave this tag empty. Search engines have   more sophisticated ways of determining the language of a page than relying on   the &lt;language&gt;metatag but they still consider it. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">38<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">&lt;Refresh&gt;   metatag<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">The   &lt;Refresh&gt; metatag is one way to redirect visitors from your site to   another. Only do it if you have recently migrated your site to a new domain   and you need to temporarily redirect visitors. When used for a long time, the   &lt;refresh&gt; metatag is regarded as unethical practice and this can hurt   your ratings. In any case, redirecting through 301 is much better. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td colspan="3" style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 93%" valign="top" width="93%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Content <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">39<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Unique   content<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Having   more content (relevant content, which is different from the content on other   sites both in wording and topics) is a real boost for your site&#8217;s rankings. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">40<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Frequency   of content change<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Frequent   changes are favored. It is great when you constantly add new content but it   is not so great when you only make small updates to existing content. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">41<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keywords   font size<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">When a   keyword in the document text is in a larger font size in comparison to other   on-page text, this makes it more noticeable, so therefore it is more   important than the rest of the text. The same applies to headings   (&lt;h1&gt;, &lt;h2&gt;, etc.), which generally are in larger font size than   the rest of the text. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">42<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keywords   formatting<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Bold and   italic are another way to emphasize important words and phrases. However, use   bold, italic and larger font sizes within reason because otherwise you might   achieve just the opposite effect. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">43<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Age of   document <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Recent   documents (or at least regularly updated ones) are favored.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">44<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">File size<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Generally   long pages are not favored, or at least you can achieve better rankings if   you have 3 short rather than 1 long page on a given topic, so split long   pages into multiple smaller ones. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">45<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Content   separation<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">From a   marketing point of view content separation (based on IP, browser type, etc.)   might be great but for SEO it is bad because when you have one URL and   differing content, search engines get confused what the actual content of the   page is. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">46<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Poor   coding and design<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Search   engines say that they do not want poorly designed and coded sites, though   there are hardly sites that are banned because of messy code or ugly images   but when the design and/or coding of a site is poor, the site might not be   indexable at all, so in this sense poor code and design can harm you a lot.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">47<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Illegal   Content<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Using   other people&#8217;s copyrighted content without their permission or using content   that promotes legal violations can get you kicked out of search engines.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">48<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Invisible   text<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">This is a   black hat SEO practice and when spiders discover that you have text specially   for them but not for humans, don&#8217;t be surprised by the penalty. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">49<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Cloaking<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Cloaking   is another illegal technique, which partially involves content separation   because spiders see one page (highly-optimized, of course), and everybody   else is presented with another version of the same page.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">50<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Doorway   pages<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Creating   pages that aim to trick spiders that your site is a highly-relevant one when   it is not, is another way to get the kick from search engines.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">51<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Duplicate   content <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">When you   have the same content on several pages on the site, this will not make your   site look larger because the duplicate   content penalty kicks in. To a lesser degree duplicate content applies to   pages that reside on other sites but obviously these cases are not always   banned  i.e. article directories or mirror sites do exist and prosper.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td colspan="3" style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 93%" valign="top" width="93%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Visual   Extras and SEO <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">52<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">JavaScript<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">If used   wisely, it will not hurt. But if your main content is displayed through   JavaScript, this makes it more difficult for spiders to follow and if   JavaScript code is a mess and spiders can&#8217;t follow it, this will definitely   hurt your ratings.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">0<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">53<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Images in   text<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Having a   text-only site is so boring but having many images and no text is a SEO sin.   Always provide in the &lt;alt&gt; tag a meaningful description of an image   but don&#8217;t stuff it with keywords or irrelevant information.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">0<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">54<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Podcasts   and videos <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Podcasts   and videos are becoming more and more popular but as with all non-textual   goodies, search engines can&#8217;t read them, so if you don&#8217;t have the tapescript   of the podcast or the video, it is as if the podcast or movie is not there   because it will not be indexed by search engines. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">0<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">55<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Images   instead of text links<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Using   images instead of text links is bad, especially when you don&#8217;t fill in the   &lt;alt&gt; tag. But even if you fill in the &lt;alt&gt; tag, it is not the   same as having a bold, underlined, 16-pt. link, so use images for navigation   only if this is really vital for the graphic layout of your site.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">56<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Frames<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Frames   are very, very bad for SEO. Avoid using them unless really necessary. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">57<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Flash<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Spiders   don&#8217;t index the content of Flash movies, so if you use Flash on your site,   don&#8217;t forget to give it an alternative textual description. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">58<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">A Flash   home page <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Fortunately   this epidemic disease seems to have come to an end. Having a Flash home page   (and sometimes whole sections of your site) and no HTML version, is a SEO   suicide.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td colspan="3" style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 93%" valign="top" width="93%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Domains,   URLs, Web Mastery <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">59<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keyword-rich   URLs and filenames <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">A very   important factor, especially for Yahoo! and MSN.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">60<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Site   Accessibility<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Another   fundamental issue, which that is often neglected. If the site (or separate   pages) is unaccessible because of broken links, 404 errors,   password-protected areas and other similar reasons, then the site simply   can&#8217;t be indexed. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">61<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Sitemap<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">It is   great to have a complete and up-to-date sitemap,   spiders love it, no matter if it is a plain old HTML sitemap or the special   Google sitemap format. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">62<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Site size<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Spiders   love large sites, so generally it is the bigger, the better. However, big   sites become user-unfriendly and difficult to navigate, so sometimes it makes   sense to separate a big site into a couple of smaller ones. On the other   hand, there are hardly sites that are penalized because they are 10,000+   pages, so don&#8217;t split your size in pieces only because it is getting larger   and larger.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">63<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Site age<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Similarly   to wine, older   sites are respected more. The idea is that an old, established site is   more trustworthy (they have been around and are here to stay) than a new site   that has just poped up and might soon disappear. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">64<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Site   theme<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">It is not   only keywords in URLs and on page that matter. The site theme is even more   important for good ranking because when the site fits into one theme, this   boosts the rankings of all its pages that are related to this theme.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">65<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">File   Location on Site<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">File   location is important and files that are located in the root directory or   near it tend to rank better than files that are buried 5 or more levels   below. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">66<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Domains   versus subdomains, separate domains<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Having a   separate domain is better  i.e. instead of having blablabla.blogspot.com, register a   separate blablabla.com domain. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">67<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Top-level   domains (TLDs)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Not all   TLDs are equal. There are TLDs that are better than others. For instance, the   most popular TLD  .com  is much better than .ws, .biz, or .info domains but   (all equal) nothing beats an old .edu or .org domain. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">68<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Hyphens   in URLs<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Hyphens   between the words in an URL increase readability and help with SEO rankings.   This applies both to hyphens in domain names and in the rest of the URL.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">69<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">URL   length<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Generally   doesn&#8217;t matter but if it is a very long URL-s, this starts to look spammy, so   avoid having more than 10 words in the URL (3 or 4 for the domain name itself   and 6 or 7 for the rest of address is acceptable).<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">0<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">70<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">IP   address<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Could   matter only for shared hosting or when a site is hosted with a free hosting   provider, when the IP or the whole C-class of IP addresses is blacklisted due   to spamming or other illegal practices. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">0<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">71<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Adsense   will boost your ranking<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Adsense   is not related in any way to SEO ranking. Google will definitely not give you   a ranking bonus because of hosting Adsense ads. Adsense might boost your   income but this has nothing to do with your search rankings. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">0<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">72<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Adwords   will boost your ranking<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Similarly   to Adsense, Adwords has nothing to do with your search rankings. Adwords will   bring more traffic to your site but this will not affect your rankings in   whatsoever way.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">0<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">73<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Hosting   downtime<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Hosting downtime is   directly related to accessibility because if a site is frequently down, it   can&#8217;t be indexed. But in practice this is a factor only if your hosting   provider is really unreliable and has less than 97-98% uptime. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">74<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Dynamic   URLs <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Spiders   prefer static URLs, though you will see many dynamic pages on top positions.   Long dynamic URLs (over 100 characters) are really bad and in any case you&#8217;d   better use a tool to rewrite   dynamic URLs in something more human- and SEO-friendly. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">75<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Session   IDs<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">This is   even worse than dynamic URLs. Don&#8217;t use session IDs for information that   you&#8217;d like to be indexed by spiders. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">76<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Bans in   robots.txt<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">If   indexing of a considerable portion of the site is banned, this is likely to   affect the nonbanned part as well because spiders will come less frequently   to a &#8220;noindex&#8221; site.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">77<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Redirects   (301 and 302)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">When not   applied properly, redirects   can hurt a lot  the target page might not open, or worse  a redirect can be   regarded as a black hat technique, when the visitor is immediately taken to a   different page.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"></span></p>
<p><!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]--><br />
<!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-402"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/seo-optimization-basics-to-towards-great-site-development/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AreaHomesbyOwner.com</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/areahomesbyownercom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/areahomesbyownercom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 21:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeff selig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Website/Domain Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bostonmediadomain.com/?p=366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AreaHomesbyOwner.com For Sale By Owner homes listed on Ebay and got a huge response, super deal for what usually goes for little vs a private sale, although I have noticed that domains on Ebay are starting to garner more and more support price wise.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bostonmediadomain.com%2Fareahomesbyownercom%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bostonmediadomain.com%2Fareahomesbyownercom%2F&amp;source=seosem&amp;style=normal&amp;service=is.gd&amp;hashtags=Domain,Domains,GA,HTTP,Title&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><a href="http://AreaHomesbyOwner.com" title="AreaHomesbyOwner.com">AreaHomesbyOwner.com </a></p>
<p>For Sale By Owner homes listed on Ebay and got a huge response, super deal for what usually goes for little vs a private sale, although I have noticed that domains on Ebay are starting to garner more and more support price wise.</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-366"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/areahomesbyownercom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>.MOBI  State Apartment Domains</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/mobi-apartment-domains/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/mobi-apartment-domains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 00:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeff selig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Browser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bostonmediadomain.com/?p=323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Advantages of .mobi Since 100% of .mobi sites must be optimized for viewing on a mobile phone, the main advantage of .mobi, from the users&#8217; perspective, is that they are guaranteed a site optimized for their smaller screens. Although a .com or any other extension can be optimized for mobile phones, in practice, only a fraction of them are, thus necessitating content adaptation solutions. Disadvantages of .mobi dotMobi recommends browser sniffing with Wurfl as a method for distinguishing between a mobile or desktop-based web browser. This risks creating two separate device-dependent World Wide Webs, one PC/desktop-based and the other mobile-based, and thus risks producing redundant content. In addition, use of the .mobi top-level domain is exclusive with any other top-level domain, and so, for example, a country code such as .UK or .JP cannot be used. A further assumption is that mobile devices all have similar screen sizes, user interfaces and connection speeds. AZAPARTMENTS.MOBI CAAPARTMENTS.MOBI COAPARTMENTS.MOBI FLAPARTMENTS.MOBI ILAPARTMENTS.MOBI INAPARTMENTS.MOBI KYAPARTMENTS.MOBI MAAPARTMENTS.MOBI MDAPARTMENTS.MOBI MIAPARTMENTS.MOBI NCAPARTMENTS.MOBI NVAPARTMENTS.MOBI OHAPARTMENTS.MOBI OKAPARTMENTS.MOBI ORAPARTMENTS.MOBI PAAPARTMENTS.MOBI RIAPARTMENTS.MOBI TNAPARTMENTS.MOBI TXAPARTMENTS.MOBI WIAPARTMENTS.MOBI]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bostonmediadomain.com%2Fmobi-apartment-domains%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bostonmediadomain.com%2Fmobi-apartment-domains%2F&amp;source=seosem&amp;style=normal&amp;service=is.gd&amp;hashtags=action,Browser,content,Domain,Domains,Headline,HTTP,Mobile,Tag,Title,web,Web+Browser&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><a href="http://www.AZAPARTMENTS.MOBI" title="AZAPARTMENTS.MOBI"> </a></p>
<h2><span class="mw-headline">Advantages of .mobi</span></h2>
<p>Since 100% of .mobi sites must be optimized for viewing on a mobile phone, the main advantage of .mobi, from the users&#8217; perspective, is that they are guaranteed a site optimized for their smaller screens. Although a .com or any other extension can be optimized for mobile phones, in practice, only a fraction of them are, thus necessitating content adaptation solutions.</p>
<h2><span class="editsection"></span><span class="mw-headline">Disadvantages of .mobi</span></h2>
<p>dotMobi recommends browser sniffing with Wurfl as a method for distinguishing between a mobile or desktop-based web browser. This risks creating two separate device-dependent World Wide Webs, one PC/desktop-based and the other mobile-based, and thus risks producing redundant content. In addition, use of the .mobi top-level domain is exclusive with any other top-level domain, and so, for example, a country code such as .UK or .JP cannot be used. A further assumption is that mobile devices all have similar screen sizes, user interfaces and connection speeds.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.AZAPARTMENTS.MOBI" title="AZAPARTMENTS.MOBI"> </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.AZAPARTMENTS.MOBI" title="AZAPARTMENTS.MOBI">AZAPARTMENTS.MOBI<br />
</a><a href="http://www.CAAPARTMENTS.MOBI" title="CAAPARTMENTS.MOBI">CAAPARTMENTS.MOBI</a><br />
<a href="http://www.COAPARTMENTS.MOBI" title="COAPARTMENTS.MOBI">COAPARTMENTS.MOBI</a><br />
<a href="http://www.FLAPARTMENTS.MOBI" title="FLAPARTMENTS.MOBI">FLAPARTMENTS.MOBI</a><br />
<a href="http://www.ILAPARTMENTS.MOBI" title="ILAPARTMENTS.MOBI">ILAPARTMENTS.MOBI</a><br />
<a href="http://www.INAPARTMENTS.MOBI" title="INAPARTMENTS.MOBI">INAPARTMENTS.MOBI</a><br />
<a href="http://www.KYAPARTMENTS.MOBI" title="KYAPARTMENTS.MOBI">KYAPARTMENTS.MOBI</a><br />
<a href="http://www.MAAPARTMENTS.MOBI" title="MAAPARTMENTS.MOBI">MAAPARTMENTS.MOBI</a><br />
<a href="http://www.MDAPARTMENTS.MOBI" title="MDAPARTMENTS.MOBI">MDAPARTMENTS.MOBI</a><br />
<a href="http://www.MIAPARTMENTS.MOBI" title="MIAPARTMENTS.MOBI">MIAPARTMENTS.MOBI</a><br />
<a href="http://www.NCAPARTMENTS.MOBI" title="NCAPARTMENTS.MOBI">NCAPARTMENTS.MOBI</a><br />
<a href="http://www.NVAPARTMENTS.MOBI" title="NVAPARTMENTS.MOBI">NVAPARTMENTS.MOBI</a><br />
<a href="http://www.OHAPARTMENTS.MOBI" title="OHAPARTMENTS.MOBI">OHAPARTMENTS.MOBI</a><br />
<a href="http://www.OKAPARTMENTS.MOBI" title="OKAPARTMENTS.MOBI">OKAPARTMENTS.MOBI</a><br />
<a href="http://www.ORAPARTMENTS.MOBI" title="ORAPARTMENTS.MOBI">ORAPARTMENTS.MOBI</a><br />
<a href="http://www.PAAPARTMENTS.MOBI" title="PAAPARTMENTS.MOBI">PAAPARTMENTS.MOBI</a><br />
<a href="http://www.RIAPARTMENTS.MOBI" title="RIAPARTMENTS.MOBI">RIAPARTMENTS.MOBI</a><br />
<a href="http://www.TNAPARTMENTS.MOBI" title="TNAPARTMENTS.MOBI">TNAPARTMENTS.MOBI</a><br />
<a href="http://www.TXAPARTMENTS.MOBI" title="TXAPARTMENTS.MOBI">TXAPARTMENTS.MOBI</a><br />
<a href="http://www.WIAPARTMENTS.MOBI" title="WIAPARTMENTS.MOBI">WIAPARTMENTS.MOBI</a></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-323"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/mobi-apartment-domains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ValentineWater.com</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/valentinewatercom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/valentinewatercom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 01:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeff selig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GIF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bostonmediadomain.com/?p=318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[valentinewater.com Here is something straight from my personal Book of Shadows &#8211; Valentine Water for potion making throughout the year and many other uses. This is also a basic pattern you can use for capturing all manner of energies for use in potions and storing them for future use, so you don&#8217;t have to wait for Valentine&#8217;s day to come around again to use this idea.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bostonmediadomain.com%2Fvalentinewatercom%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bostonmediadomain.com%2Fvalentinewatercom%2F&amp;source=seosem&amp;style=normal&amp;service=is.gd&amp;hashtags=action,Domain,Domains,GA,GIF,HTTP,Index,PHP,Traffic&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><a href="https://manager.trafficz.com/index.php?object=Domain&amp;action=build_form&amp;DomainID=14974716&amp;input_state=view&amp;current_item=list%20domains" class="alt">valentinewater.com</a><span class="alt"></span></p>
<p><img src="http://magic-spells-and-potions.com/images/topics/copperfire.gif" alt="Magic Potions" align="left" border="0" hspace="10" vspace="10" /></p>
<p><font color="#a4a4ff">Here is something straight from my personal Book of  Shadows &#8211; </font>  <font color="#ff9966">Valentine Water </font>  <font color="#a4a4ff">for potion making throughout the year and many other uses. This is also a basic pattern you can use for capturing all manner of energies for use in potions and storing them for future use, so you don&#8217;t have to wait for Valentine&#8217;s day to come around again to use this idea.  </font></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-318"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/valentinewatercom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

