<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Boston Media Domain &#187; cloak</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/tag/cloak/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com</link>
	<description>Search, Social and Online Media for Domains</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:18:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>free web tech tools</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/free-web-tech-tools/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/free-web-tech-tools/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeff selig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary & Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[download]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[share]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bostonmediadomain.com/?p=429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IPTools offers a wide variety of online networking tools. With this site you can look up IP address information, check spam databases, run pings, run traceroutes, lookup WHOIS information and much more. BugMeNot allows you to find and share logins for sites that require you to register. This tool is great to use when you don&#8217;t want to have to go through the process of creating an account for a site when you just want to login once for something like a driver. SpeedTest.net allows you to test your Internet connection speed. It&#8217;s great to use when you want to see if your ISP is holding up on their end of the bargain. Much better than You Get Signal: http://www.grc.com/intro.htm Desktoptopia is a cool app for the mac that loads designer desktops on your monitor from an ever growing database of top creative desktops. www.desktoptopia.com http://spambox.us/ lets you set the expire date of your temporary email address from 30 minutes, to a whole year In addition to my last post, http://www.youconvertit.com/ lets you convert files up to 300Mb in size, instead of media-convert&#8217;s 150Mb and zamzar&#8217;s 100Mb. It also lets you convert up to 5 files at once. dontreg.com &#8211; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bostonmediadomain.com%2Ffree-web-tech-tools%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bostonmediadomain.com%2Ffree-web-tech-tools%2F&amp;source=seosem&amp;style=normal&amp;service=is.gd&amp;hashtags=cloak,download,email,isp,share&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><a title="IPTools" href="http://www.iptools.com/"><img src="http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/images/iptools1.png" alt="" width="96" height="30" /></a><br />
<a title="IPTools" href="http://www.iptools.com/">IPTools</a> offers a wide variety of online networking tools. With this site you can look up IP address information, check spam databases, run pings, run traceroutes, lookup WHOIS information and much more.</p>
<p><a title="BugMeNot" href="http://www.bugmenot.com/"><img src="http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/images/bugmenot1.png" alt="" width="119" height="30" /></a><br />
<a title="BugMeNot" href="http://www.bugmenot.com/">BugMeNot</a> allows you to find and share logins for sites that require you to register. This tool is great to use when you don&#8217;t want to have to go through the process of creating an account for a site when you just want to login once for something like a driver.</p>
<p><a title="SpeedTest.net" href="http://www.speedtest.net/"><img src="http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/images/speedtest1.png" alt="" width="190" height="30" /></a><br />
<a title="SpeedTest.net" href="http://www.speedtest.net/">SpeedTest.net</a> allows you to test your Internet connection speed. It&#8217;s great to use when you want to see if your ISP is holding up on their end of the bargain.</p>
<p>Much better than You Get Signal: <a title="http://www.grc.com/intro.htm" href="http://www.grc.com/intro.htm">http://www.grc.com/intro.htm</a></p>
<p>Desktoptopia is a cool app for the mac that loads designer desktops on your monitor from an ever growing database of top creative desktops. <a title="www.desktoptopia.com" href="http://www.desktoptopia.com">www.desktoptopia.com</a></p>
<p><a title="http://spambox.us/" href="http://spambox.us/">http://spambox.us/</a> lets you set the expire date of your  temporary email address from 30 minutes, to a whole year</p>
<p>In addition to my last post, <a title="http://www.youconvertit.com/" href="http://www.youconvertit.com/">http://www.youconvertit.com/</a> lets you convert files up to 300Mb in size, instead of media-convert&#8217;s 150Mb and zamzar&#8217;s 100Mb. It also lets you convert up to 5 files at once.</p>
<p><a title="temporary email" href="http://www.dontreg.com">dontreg.com &#8211; temp email</a> is useful too.</p>
<p>Wiki tools <a href="www.zoho.com" target="blank">Zoho</a> to the list.  It provides around 14 different tools like wiki to CRM tools, chat and may more.</p>
<p>Regarding <strong>security</strong> and mail delivery, I suggest this very interesting service: <a title="https://lockbin.com/" href="https://lockbin.com/">https://lockbin.com/</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s very useful, reliable and easy-to-use. A big help ensuring your <strong>privacy online</strong>.</p>
<p>There are more free DNS, IP and host tools at <a href="http://www.mydnstools.info">mydnstools.info</a>, including a very cool web host / webserver info tool.</p>
<p>Here is a list that has hundreds of free ware ranked by popularity</p>
<p><a></a><a href="http://michaeleee.blogspot.com/2007/01/list-of-best-freeware.html">http://michaeleee.blogspot.com/2007/01/list-of-best-freeware.html</a></p>
<p>I find <a href="http://www.freetube.us.tc">FreeTube</a> useful when theres some news event thing happening that I want to learn more on..it shows live television channels mostly news rather entertaining.</p>
<p><a title="Del.icio.us" href="http://del.icio.us/"><img src="http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/images/delicious1.png" alt="" width="167" height="30" /></a><br />
<a title="Del.icio.us" href="http://del.icio.us/">Del.icio.us</a> is a social bookmarking site that allows you to bookmark sites and view them from any computer. This site is great because not only can you bookmark sites and view them anywhere, you can also search through everyone&#8217;s bookmarks to find great tech articles.</p>
<p><a title="Omnidrive" href="http://www.omnidrive.com/"><img src="http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/images/omnidrive1.png" alt="" width="71" height="40" /></a><br />
<a title="Omnidrive" href="http://www.omnidrive.com/">Omnidrive</a> is an online storage service that allows you to upload large files, access them from any computer, and share them with other people. They also offer the ability to edit your Office documents using Zoho without ever downloading them. You get 1GB free and the ability to upgrade to 1 terabyte. This site is great for hosting your tech tools and accessing them from computers you are working on.</p>
<p><a title="10 Minute Mail" href="http://10minutemail.com/"><img src="http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/images/10minutemail1.png" alt="" width="162" height="30" /></a><br />
<a title="10 Minute Mail" href="http://10minutemail.com/">10 Minute Mail</a> allows you to create temporary email addresses that expire after 10 minutes. It&#8217;s great to use for sites that require you to receive something through email but you don&#8217;t want to be bombarded with spam.</p>
<p><a title="Free Password Generator" href="http://www.freepasswordgenerator.com/"><strong>Free Password Generator</strong></a><br />
<a title="Free Password Generator" href="http://www.freepasswordgenerator.com/">Free Password Generator</a> generates very strong and unique passwords. Before you generate your passwords, you can predefine settings such has what type of symbols to use and the length you want it to be.</p>
<p><a title="Trend Micro HouseCall" href="http://housecall.trendmicro.com/"><img src="http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/images/trendmicro1.png" alt="" width="80" height="30" /></a><br />
<a title="Trend Micro HouseCall" href="http://housecall.trendmicro.com/">Trend Micro HouseCall</a> is an online virus, spyware, and malware scanner that runs in your web browser. It&#8217;s very handy when you are working on a computer that doesn&#8217;t have antivirus software and you want to scan it without having to install one.</p>
<p><a title="You Get Signal" href="http://www.yougetsignal.com/openPortsTool/"><img src="http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/images/yougetsignal1.png" alt="" width="141" height="30" /></a><br />
<a title="You Get Signal" href="http://www.yougetsignal.com/openPortsTool/">You Get Signal</a> allows you to check which ports are open into your network. This is great tool to use when you are trying to patch holes in your firewall.</p>
<p><a title="WhatIsThatFile.com" href="http://www.whatisthatfile.com/"><span><strong>WhatIsThatFile.com</strong></span></a><br />
<a title="WhatIsThatFile.com" href="http://www.whatisthatfile.com/">WhatIsThatFile.com</a> allows you to identify unknown files on a computer. This tool is great for looking up files that you suspect might be possible viruses, trojans, or malware.</p>
<p><a title="YouSendIt" href="http://www.yousendit.com/"><img src="http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/images/yousendit1.png" alt="" width="88" height="40" /></a><br />
<a title="YouSendIt" href="http://www.yousendit.com/">YouSendIt</a> allows you to send large files to other people when the files are too large for your email. This tool is a great alternative to using FTP.</p>
<p><a title="Dll-Files.com" href="http://www.dll-files.com/"><img src="http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/images/dllfiles1.png" alt="" width="182" height="30" /></a><br />
<a title="Dll-Files.com" href="http://www.dll-files.com/">DLL-files.com</a> has a huge library of downloadable dll files. Next time you get an error about a missing dll file, you can go here and download it.</p>
<p><a title="Google Microsoft Search" href="http://www.google.com/microsoft.html"><img src="http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/images/googlemicrosoft1.png" alt="" width="73" height="30" /></a><br />
<a title="Google Microsoft Search" href="http://www.google.com/microsoft.html">Google Microsoft Search</a> allows you to search specifically through Microsoft-related sites. This site is great for searching through Microsoft tech articles for a specific problem.</p>
<p><a title="Zamzar" href="http://www.zamzar.com/"><img src="http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/images/zamzar1.png" alt="" width="102" height="30" /></a><br />
<a title="Zamzar" href="http://www.zamzar.com/">Zamzar</a> is a file conversion tool that allows you to convert file types through their site. Currently they support over 60 file types. This is a great tool for converting files when you don&#8217;t have the appropriate application to do so.  make sure your pop up blocker is turned on!</p>
<p><a title="DRPD" href="http://www.routerpasswords.com/"><img src="http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/images/drpd1.png" alt="" width="349" height="30" /></a><br />
<a title="DRPD" href="http://www.routerpasswords.com/">Default Router Passwords Database</a> allows you to search for router as well as other devices default passwords. This tool comes in very handy when you have to reset a device but can&#8217;t find the manual to look up the default password.</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-429"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/free-web-tech-tools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO Optimization: Basics to great site development</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/seo-optimization-basics-to-towards-great-site-development/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/seo-optimization-basics-to-towards-great-site-development/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 13:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeff selig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary & Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anchor Text]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Backlink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Hat SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blacklist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broken Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloaking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Description]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duplicate Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exact match]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[factors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[follow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frames]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frequency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HITS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inbound Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP Address]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JavaScript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyword]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keyword Density]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keyword Phrase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keyword Stuffing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link Buying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link Farm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mirror Site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Need]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[on page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outbound Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pixel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proximity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ranking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relevancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robots.txt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Script]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitemap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spamming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stemming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Text Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title Tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[URL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bostonmediadomain.com/?p=402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1 Keywords in &#60;title&#62; tag This is one of the most important places to have a keyword because what is written inside the &#60;title&#62; tag shows in search results as your page title. The title tag must be short (6 or 7 words at most) and the the keyword must be near the beginning. +3 2 Keywords in URL Keywords in URLs help a lot &#8211; e.g. &#8211; http://domainname.com/seo-services.html, where &#8220;SEO services&#8221; is the keyword phrase you attempt to rank well for. But if you don&#8217;t have the keywords in other parts of the document, don&#8217;t rely on having them in the URL. +3 3 Keyword density in document text Another very important factor you need to check. 3-7 % for major keywords is best, 1-2 for minor. Keyword density of over 10% is suspicious and looks more like keyword stuffing, than a naturally written text. +3 4 Keywords in anchor text Also very important, especially for the anchor text of inbound links, because if you have the keyword in the anchor text in a link from another site, this is regarded as getting a vote from this site not only about your site in general, but about the keyword [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bostonmediadomain.com%2Fseo-optimization-basics-to-towards-great-site-development%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bostonmediadomain.com%2Fseo-optimization-basics-to-towards-great-site-development%2F&amp;source=seosem&amp;style=normal&amp;service=is.gd&amp;hashtags=adwords,Anchor+Text,app,attention,Backlink,Black+Hat+SEO,Blacklist,blog,Bold,Brin,Broken+Link,Browser,buy,cloak,Cloaking,community,content,Copyright,Description,Directory,Domain,Domain+name,domain+names,Domains,Duplicate+Content,exact+match,factors,Flash,follow,Frames,Free,Frequency,GA,google,Headings,Hit,HITS,Home+Page,html,HTTP,IAB,Impression,Inbound+Link,Index,Internal+Link,ip,IP+Address,isp,JavaScript,keyword,Keyword+Density,Keyword+Phrase,Keyword+Stuffing,Link,Link+Buying,Link+Farm,links,marketing,Matt,Mirror+Site,Navigation,Need,on+page,Opera,optimization,Outbound+Link,Page,Penalty,Pixel,Proximity,ranking,Relevancy,Rob,Robots.txt,RON,ROS,Script,search,Search+Engine,search+engines,SEO,share,Sitemap,Spam,Spamming,Spider,Stemming,Tag,tags,Text+Link,Title,Title+Tag,Traffic,trust,Update,URL,urls,Visit,web,Yahoo%21&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<table class="MsoNormalTable" style="width: 100%" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<tr style="height: 47.25pt">
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%; height: 47.25pt" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%; height: 47.25pt" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keywords   in &lt;title&gt; tag <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%; height: 47.25pt" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">This is   one of the most important places to have a keyword because what is written   inside the &lt;title&gt; tag shows in search results as your page title. The   title tag must be short (6 or 7 words at most) and the the keyword must be   near the beginning. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%; height: 47.25pt" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keywords   in URL<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keywords   in URLs help a lot &#8211; e.g. &#8211; http://domainname.com/seo-services.html,   where &#8220;SEO services&#8221; is the keyword phrase you attempt to rank well   for. But if you don&#8217;t have the keywords in other parts of the document, don&#8217;t   rely on having them in the URL.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keyword   density in document text<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Another   very important factor you need to check. 3-7 %   for major keywords is best, 1-2 for minor. Keyword density of over 10% is   suspicious and looks more like keyword stuffing, than a naturally written   text.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">4<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keywords   in anchor text<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Also very   important, especially for the anchor text of   inbound links, because if you have the keyword in the anchor text in a   link from another site, this is regarded as getting a vote from this site not   only about your site in general, but about the keyword in particular. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">5<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keywords   in headings (&lt;H1&gt;, &lt;H2&gt;, etc. tags)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">One more   place where keywords count a lot. But beware that your page has actual text about   the particular keyword.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">6<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keywords   in the beginning of a document<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Also   counts, though not as much as anchor text, title tag or headings. However,   have in mind that the beginning of a document does not necessarily mean the   first paragraph  for instance if you use tables, the first paragraph of text   might be in the second half of the table.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">7<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keywords   in &lt;alt&gt; tags<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Spiders   don&#8217;t read images but they do read their textual descriptions in the   &lt;alt&gt; tag, so if you have images on your page, fill in the &lt;alt&gt;   tag with some keywords about them. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">8<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keywords   in metatags<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Less and   less important, especially for Google. Yahoo! and MSN still rely on them, so   if you are optimizing for Yahoo! or MSN, fill these tags properly. In any   case, filling these tags properly will not hurt, so do it.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">9<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keyword   proximity<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keyword   proximity measures how close in the text the keywords are. It is best if they   are immediately one after the other (e.g. &#8220;dog food&#8221;), with no   other words between them. For instance, if you have &#8220;dog&#8221; in the   first paragraph and &#8220;food&#8221; in the third paragraph, this also counts   but not as much as having the phrase &#8220;dog food&#8221; without any other   words in between. Keyword proximity is applicable for keyword phrases that   consist of 2 or more words.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">10<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keyword   phrases<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">In   addition to keywords, you can optimize for keyword phrases that consist of   several words  e.g. &#8220;SEO services&#8221;. It is best when the keyword   phrases you optimize for are popular ones, so you can get a lot of exact   matches of the search string but sometimes it makes sense to optimize for 2   or 3 separate keywords (&#8220;SEO&#8221; and &#8220;services&#8221;) than for   one phrase that might occasionally get an exact match.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">11<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Secondary   keywords<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Optimizing   for secondary keywords can be a golden mine because when everybody else is   optimizing for the most popular keywords, there will be less competition (and   probably more hits) for pages that are optimized for the minor words. For   instance, &#8220;real estate new jersey&#8221; might have thousand times less   hits than &#8220;real estate&#8221; only but if you are operating in New Jersey,   you will get less but considerably better targeted traffic. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">12<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keyword   stemming<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">For   English this is not so much of a factor because words that stem from the same   root (e.g. dog, dogs, doggy, etc.) are considered related and if you have &#8220;dog&#8221;   on your page, you will get hits for &#8220;dogs&#8221; and &#8220;doggy&#8221; as   well, but for other languages keywords stemming could be an issue because   different words that stem from the same root are considered as not related   and you might need to optimize for all of them. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">13<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Synonyms<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Optimizing   for synonyms of the target keywords, in addition to the main keywords. This   is good for sites in English, for which search engines are smart enough to   use synonyms as well, when ranking sites but for many other languages   synonyms are not taken into account, when calculating rankings and relevancy.   <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">14<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keyword   Mistypes<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Spelling   errors are very frequent and if you know that your target keywords have   popular misspellings or alternative spellings (i.e. Christmas and Xmas), you   might be tempted to optimize for them. Yes, this might get you some more   traffic but having spelling mistakes on your site does not make a good   impression, so you&#8217;d better don&#8217;t do it, or do it only in the metatags.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">0<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">15<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keyword   dilution <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">When you   are optimizing for an excessive amount of keywords, especially unrelated   ones, this will affect the performance of all your keywords and even the   major ones will be lost (diluted) in the text.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">16<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keyword   stuffing<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Any   artificially inflated keyword density (10% and over) is keyword stuffing and   you risk getting banned from search engines. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td colspan="3" style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 93%" valign="top" width="93%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Links &#8211;   internal, inbound, outbound <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">17<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Anchor   text of inbound links<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">As   discussed in the Keywords section, this is one of the most important factors   for good rankings. It is best if you have a keyword in the anchor text but   even if you don&#8217;t, it is still OK.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">18<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Origin of   inbound links<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Besides   the anchor text, it is important if the site that links to you is a reputable   one or not. Generally sites with greater Google PR are considered reputable. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">19<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Links   from similar sites<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Having   links from similar sites is very, very useful. It indicates that the   competition is voting for you and you are popular within your topical   community. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">20<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Links   from .edu and .gov sites<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">These   links are precious because .edu and .gov sites are more reputable than .com.   .biz, .info, etc. domains. Additionally, such links are hard to obtain. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">21<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Number of   backlinks<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Generally   the more, the better. But the reputation of the sites that link to you is   more important than their number. Also important is their anchor text, is   there a keyword in it, how old are they, etc.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">22<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Anchor   text of internal links<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">This also   matters, though not as much as the anchor text of inbound links.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">23<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Around-the-anchor   text<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">The text   that is immediately before and after the anchor text also matters because it   further indicates the relevance of the link  i.e. if the link is artificial   or it naturally flows in the text. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">24<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Age of   inbound links<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">The   older, the better. Getting many new links in a short time suggests buying   them. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">25<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Links   from directories<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Great,   though it strongly depends on which directories. Being listed in DMOZ, Yahoo   Directory and similar directories is a great boost for your ranking but   having tons of links from PR0 directories is useless and it can even be   regarded as link spamming, if you have hundreds or thousands of such links. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">26<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Number of   outgoing links on the page that links to you<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">The   fewer, the better for you because this way your link looks more important. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">27<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Named   anchors<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Named   anchors (the target place of internal links) are useful for internal   navigation but are also useful for SEO because you stress additionally that a   particular page, paragraph or text is important. In the code, named anchors   look like this: &lt;A href=&#8221;#dogs&#8221;&gt;Read about dogs&lt;/A&gt;   and &#8220;#dogs&#8221; is the named anchor. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">28<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">IP   address of inbound link<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Google   denies that they discriminate against links that come from the same IP   address or C class of addresses, so for Google the IP address can be   considered neutral to the weight of inbound links. However, MSN and Yahoo!   may discard links from the same IPs or IP classes, so it is always better to   get links from different IPs.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">29<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Inbound   links from link farms and other suspicious sites <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">This does   not affect you in any way, provided that the links are not reciprocal. The   idea is that it is beyond your control to define what a link farm links to,   so you don&#8217;t get penalized when such sites link to you because this is not   your fault but in any case you&#8217;d better stay away from link farms and similar   suspicious sites. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">0<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">30<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Many   outgoing links<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Google   does not like pages that consists mainly of links, so you&#8217;d better keep them   under 100 per page. Having many outgoing links does not get you any benefits   in terms of ranking and could even make your situation worse.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">31<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Excessive   linking, link spamming<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">It is bad   for your rankings, when you have many links to/from the same sites (even if   it is not a cross- linking scheme or links to bad neighbors) because it   suggests link buying or at least spamming. In the best case only some of the   links are taken into account for SEO rankings.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">32<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Outbound   links to link farms and other suspicious sites<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Unlike   inbound links from link farms and other suspicious sites, outbound links to bad neighbors   can drown you. You need periodically to check the status of the sites you   link to because sometimes good sites become bad neighbors and vice versa. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">33<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Cross-linking<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Cross-linking   occurs when site A links to site B, site B links to site C and site C links   back to site A. This is the simplest example but more complex schemes are   possible. Cross-linking looks like disguised reciprocal link trading and is   penalized. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">34<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Single   pixel links<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">when you   have a link that is a pixel or so wide it is invisible for humans, so nobody   will click on it and it is obvious that this link is an attempt to manipulate   search engines. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td colspan="3" style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 93%" valign="top" width="93%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Metatags <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">35<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">&lt;Description&gt;   metatag<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Metatags   are becoming less and less important but if there are metatags that still   matter, these are the &lt;description&gt; and &lt;keywords&gt; ones. Use the   &lt;Description&gt; metatag to write the description of your site. Besides   the fact that metatags still rock on MSN and Yahoo!, the &lt;Description&gt;   metatag has one more advantage  it sometimes pops in the description of your   site in search results. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">36<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">&lt;Keywords&gt;   metatag<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">The   &lt;Keywords&gt; metatag also matters, though as all metatags it gets almost   no attention from Google and some attention from MSN and Yahoo! Keep the   metatag reasonably long  10 to 20 keywords at most. Don&#8217;t stuff the   &lt;Keywords&gt; tag with keywords that you don&#8217;t have on the page, this is   bad for your rankings. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">37<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">&lt;Language&gt;   metatag<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">If your   site is language-specific, don&#8217;t leave this tag empty. Search engines have   more sophisticated ways of determining the language of a page than relying on   the &lt;language&gt;metatag but they still consider it. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">38<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">&lt;Refresh&gt;   metatag<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">The   &lt;Refresh&gt; metatag is one way to redirect visitors from your site to   another. Only do it if you have recently migrated your site to a new domain   and you need to temporarily redirect visitors. When used for a long time, the   &lt;refresh&gt; metatag is regarded as unethical practice and this can hurt   your ratings. In any case, redirecting through 301 is much better. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td colspan="3" style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 93%" valign="top" width="93%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Content <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">39<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Unique   content<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Having   more content (relevant content, which is different from the content on other   sites both in wording and topics) is a real boost for your site&#8217;s rankings. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">40<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Frequency   of content change<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Frequent   changes are favored. It is great when you constantly add new content but it   is not so great when you only make small updates to existing content. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">41<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keywords   font size<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">When a   keyword in the document text is in a larger font size in comparison to other   on-page text, this makes it more noticeable, so therefore it is more   important than the rest of the text. The same applies to headings   (&lt;h1&gt;, &lt;h2&gt;, etc.), which generally are in larger font size than   the rest of the text. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">42<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keywords   formatting<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Bold and   italic are another way to emphasize important words and phrases. However, use   bold, italic and larger font sizes within reason because otherwise you might   achieve just the opposite effect. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">43<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Age of   document <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Recent   documents (or at least regularly updated ones) are favored.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">44<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">File size<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Generally   long pages are not favored, or at least you can achieve better rankings if   you have 3 short rather than 1 long page on a given topic, so split long   pages into multiple smaller ones. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">45<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Content   separation<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">From a   marketing point of view content separation (based on IP, browser type, etc.)   might be great but for SEO it is bad because when you have one URL and   differing content, search engines get confused what the actual content of the   page is. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">46<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Poor   coding and design<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Search   engines say that they do not want poorly designed and coded sites, though   there are hardly sites that are banned because of messy code or ugly images   but when the design and/or coding of a site is poor, the site might not be   indexable at all, so in this sense poor code and design can harm you a lot.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">47<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Illegal   Content<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Using   other people&#8217;s copyrighted content without their permission or using content   that promotes legal violations can get you kicked out of search engines.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">48<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Invisible   text<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">This is a   black hat SEO practice and when spiders discover that you have text specially   for them but not for humans, don&#8217;t be surprised by the penalty. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">49<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Cloaking<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Cloaking   is another illegal technique, which partially involves content separation   because spiders see one page (highly-optimized, of course), and everybody   else is presented with another version of the same page.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">50<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Doorway   pages<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Creating   pages that aim to trick spiders that your site is a highly-relevant one when   it is not, is another way to get the kick from search engines.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">51<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Duplicate   content <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">When you   have the same content on several pages on the site, this will not make your   site look larger because the duplicate   content penalty kicks in. To a lesser degree duplicate content applies to   pages that reside on other sites but obviously these cases are not always   banned  i.e. article directories or mirror sites do exist and prosper.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td colspan="3" style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 93%" valign="top" width="93%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Visual   Extras and SEO <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">52<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">JavaScript<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">If used   wisely, it will not hurt. But if your main content is displayed through   JavaScript, this makes it more difficult for spiders to follow and if   JavaScript code is a mess and spiders can&#8217;t follow it, this will definitely   hurt your ratings.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">0<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">53<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Images in   text<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Having a   text-only site is so boring but having many images and no text is a SEO sin.   Always provide in the &lt;alt&gt; tag a meaningful description of an image   but don&#8217;t stuff it with keywords or irrelevant information.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">0<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">54<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Podcasts   and videos <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Podcasts   and videos are becoming more and more popular but as with all non-textual   goodies, search engines can&#8217;t read them, so if you don&#8217;t have the tapescript   of the podcast or the video, it is as if the podcast or movie is not there   because it will not be indexed by search engines. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">0<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">55<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Images   instead of text links<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Using   images instead of text links is bad, especially when you don&#8217;t fill in the   &lt;alt&gt; tag. But even if you fill in the &lt;alt&gt; tag, it is not the   same as having a bold, underlined, 16-pt. link, so use images for navigation   only if this is really vital for the graphic layout of your site.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">56<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Frames<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Frames   are very, very bad for SEO. Avoid using them unless really necessary. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">57<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Flash<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Spiders   don&#8217;t index the content of Flash movies, so if you use Flash on your site,   don&#8217;t forget to give it an alternative textual description. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">58<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">A Flash   home page <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Fortunately   this epidemic disease seems to have come to an end. Having a Flash home page   (and sometimes whole sections of your site) and no HTML version, is a SEO   suicide.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td colspan="3" style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 93%" valign="top" width="93%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Domains,   URLs, Web Mastery <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">59<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Keyword-rich   URLs and filenames <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">A very   important factor, especially for Yahoo! and MSN.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">60<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Site   Accessibility<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Another   fundamental issue, which that is often neglected. If the site (or separate   pages) is unaccessible because of broken links, 404 errors,   password-protected areas and other similar reasons, then the site simply   can&#8217;t be indexed. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">61<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Sitemap<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">It is   great to have a complete and up-to-date sitemap,   spiders love it, no matter if it is a plain old HTML sitemap or the special   Google sitemap format. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">62<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Site size<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Spiders   love large sites, so generally it is the bigger, the better. However, big   sites become user-unfriendly and difficult to navigate, so sometimes it makes   sense to separate a big site into a couple of smaller ones. On the other   hand, there are hardly sites that are penalized because they are 10,000+   pages, so don&#8217;t split your size in pieces only because it is getting larger   and larger.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">63<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Site age<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Similarly   to wine, older   sites are respected more. The idea is that an old, established site is   more trustworthy (they have been around and are here to stay) than a new site   that has just poped up and might soon disappear. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">64<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Site   theme<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">It is not   only keywords in URLs and on page that matter. The site theme is even more   important for good ranking because when the site fits into one theme, this   boosts the rankings of all its pages that are related to this theme.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">65<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">File   Location on Site<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">File   location is important and files that are located in the root directory or   near it tend to rank better than files that are buried 5 or more levels   below. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">66<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Domains   versus subdomains, separate domains<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Having a   separate domain is better  i.e. instead of having blablabla.blogspot.com, register a   separate blablabla.com domain. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">67<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Top-level   domains (TLDs)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Not all   TLDs are equal. There are TLDs that are better than others. For instance, the   most popular TLD  .com  is much better than .ws, .biz, or .info domains but   (all equal) nothing beats an old .edu or .org domain. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">68<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Hyphens   in URLs<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Hyphens   between the words in an URL increase readability and help with SEO rankings.   This applies both to hyphens in domain names and in the rest of the URL.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">+1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">69<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">URL   length<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Generally   doesn&#8217;t matter but if it is a very long URL-s, this starts to look spammy, so   avoid having more than 10 words in the URL (3 or 4 for the domain name itself   and 6 or 7 for the rest of address is acceptable).<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">0<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">70<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">IP   address<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Could   matter only for shared hosting or when a site is hosted with a free hosting   provider, when the IP or the whole C-class of IP addresses is blacklisted due   to spamming or other illegal practices. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">0<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">71<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Adsense   will boost your ranking<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Adsense   is not related in any way to SEO ranking. Google will definitely not give you   a ranking bonus because of hosting Adsense ads. Adsense might boost your   income but this has nothing to do with your search rankings. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">0<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">72<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Adwords   will boost your ranking<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Similarly   to Adsense, Adwords has nothing to do with your search rankings. Adwords will   bring more traffic to your site but this will not affect your rankings in   whatsoever way.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">0<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">73<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Hosting   downtime<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Hosting downtime is   directly related to accessibility because if a site is frequently down, it   can&#8217;t be indexed. But in practice this is a factor only if your hosting   provider is really unreliable and has less than 97-98% uptime. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">74<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Dynamic   URLs <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Spiders   prefer static URLs, though you will see many dynamic pages on top positions.   Long dynamic URLs (over 100 characters) are really bad and in any case you&#8217;d   better use a tool to rewrite   dynamic URLs in something more human- and SEO-friendly. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">75<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Session   IDs<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">This is   even worse than dynamic URLs. Don&#8217;t use session IDs for information that   you&#8217;d like to be indexed by spiders. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">76<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Bans in   robots.txt<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">If   indexing of a considerable portion of the site is banned, this is likely to   affect the nonbanned part as well because spiders will come less frequently   to a &#8220;noindex&#8221; site.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 7%" valign="top" width="7%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">77<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 24%" valign="top" width="24%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Redirects   (301 and 302)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 62%" valign="top" width="62%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">When not   applied properly, redirects   can hurt a lot  the target page might not open, or worse  a redirect can be   regarded as a black hat technique, when the visitor is immediately taken to a   different page.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 1.5pt; width: 6%" valign="top" width="6%">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">-3<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"></span></p>
<p><!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]--><br />
<!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-402"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/seo-optimization-basics-to-towards-great-site-development/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NANOlevitation.com</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/nanolevitatoncom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/nanolevitatoncom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 23:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeff selig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Icon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bostonmediadomain.com/?p=182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NANOlevitation.com Physicists have &#8216;solved&#8217; mystery of levitation Levitation has been elevated from being pure science fiction to science fact, according to a study reported today by physicists. Beijing saleswoman demonstrates toy which levitates by magnetic force; Physicists have &#8216;solved&#8217; mystery of levitation In earlier work the same team of theoretical physicists showed that invisibility cloaks are feasible. Now, in another report that sounds like it comes out of the pages of a Harry Potter book, the University of St Andrews team has created an &#8216;incredible levitation effects by engineering the force of nature which normally causes objects to stick together. Professor Ulf Leonhardt and Dr Thomas Philbin, from the University of St Andrews in Scotland, have worked out a way of reversing this pheneomenon, known as the Casimir force, so that it repels instead of attracts. Their discovery could ultimately lead to frictionless micro-machines with moving parts that levitate But they say that, in principle at least, the same effect could be used to levitate bigger objects too, even a person. advertisement The Casimir force is a consequence of quantum mechanics, the theory that describes the world of atoms and subatomic particles that is not only the most successful theory [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bostonmediadomain.com%2Fnanolevitatoncom%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bostonmediadomain.com%2Fnanolevitatoncom%2F&amp;source=seosem&amp;style=normal&amp;service=is.gd&amp;hashtags=cloak,CTR,HTTP,Icon,ip,Page,Rob,ROS,SEM,Title&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><a href="http://NANOlevitaton.com" title="NANOlevitaton.com">NANOlevitation.com</a></p>
<p><img src="http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com/phikent/3d/Horus3.jpg" border="0" /></p>
<p>Physicists have &#8216;solved&#8217; mystery of levitation</p>
<p>Levitation has been elevated from being pure science fiction to science fact, according to a study reported today by physicists.</p>
<p>Beijing saleswoman demonstrates toy which levitates by magnetic force; Physicists have &#8216;solved&#8217; mystery of levitation</p>
<p>In earlier work the same team of theoretical physicists showed that invisibility cloaks are feasible.</p>
<p>Now, in another report that sounds like it comes out of the pages of a Harry Potter book, the University of St Andrews team has created an &#8216;incredible levitation effects by engineering the force of nature which normally causes objects to stick together.</p>
<p>Professor Ulf Leonhardt and Dr Thomas Philbin, from the University of St Andrews in Scotland, have worked out a way of reversing this pheneomenon, known as the Casimir force, so that it repels instead of attracts.</p>
<p>Their discovery could ultimately lead to frictionless micro-machines with moving parts that levitate But they say that, in principle at least, the same effect could be used to levitate bigger objects too, even a person.<br />
advertisement</p>
<p>The Casimir force is a consequence of quantum mechanics, the theory that describes the world of atoms and subatomic particles that is not only the most successful theory of physics but also the most baffling.</p>
<p>The force is due to neither electrical charge or gravity, for example, but the fluctuations in all-pervasive energy fields in the intervening empty space between the objects and is one reason atoms stick together, also explaining a dry glue effect that enables a gecko to walk across a ceiling.</p>
<p>Now, using a special lens of a kind that has already been built, Prof Ulf Leonhardt and Dr Thomas Philbin report in the New Journal of Physics they can engineer the Casimir force to repel, rather than attact.</p>
<p>Because the Casimir force causes problems for nanotechnologists, who are trying to build electrical circuits and tiny mechanical devices on silicon chips, among other things, the team believes the feat could initially be used to stop tiny objects from sticking to each other.</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-182"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bostonmediadomain.com/nanolevitatoncom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

